Supreme Court High Court Judgment updates| taxation GST laws| NRI help

Land acquisition compensation for wet land enhanced by the Supreme Court and reversed the orders of court below.

August 11, 2018

 

 

 

Land Acquisition compensation of wet land in Kerala enhanced by Supreme Court

A Bench of Supreme Court Judges Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Justice Abdul Nazeer in Civil Appeal No. 6281-6282 of 2009, K.S. Rajan (D) Through LRs V. The State of Kerala & Anr enhanced the land acquisition compensation paid for wet land in Kerala and reversed the Judgment of courts below and partly allowed the appeal in favour of land owner.

 

 

 

Facts of the case
The original appellant is the owner of the land measuring around 4.30 acres situated in the District of Kottyam (Kerala). The State of Kerala issued a notification dated 25.11.1980 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and acquired total land measuring around 30 acres in Kottayam Municipality for implementation of "multipurpose development scheme at Kodimatha" on the acquired land. It was followed by declaration under Section 6 of the Act. The appellant's land (4.30 acres) was also acquired in these acquisition proceedings by notification issued under Section 4 of the Act.


The Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) then held an enquiry, as contemplated under Section 11 of the Act, for payment of compensation to the landowners and by his award dated 06.08.1984 determined the compensation as under:

For Dry land : Rs.4631/- per cent
For Chira land : Rs.1725/- per cent
For Wet land : Rs.203/- per cent

The appellants felt aggrieved by the determination made by the LAO and sought reference to the Civil Court. By award dated 28.02.1990, the Reference Court re-determined the compensation as under:

For Dry land : Rs.7500/- per cent
For Chira land : Rs.2000/- per cent
For Wet land : Rs.2000/- per cent

Felt aggrieved by the award of the Reference Court, the State filed an appeal in the High Court of Kerala. The High Court, by order dated 23.06.1992 allowed the appeal and remanded the case to the Reference Court for fresh determination. After the remand, the Reference Court by award 07.01.1995 re-determined the compensation as under :

For Dry land : Rs.5000/- per cent
For Chira land : Rs.2500/- per cent
For Wet land : Rs.450/- per cent

 

By the aforesaid award passed by the Reference Court, the appellant felt aggrieved and filed appeal in the High Court. By impugned order, the High Court made partial modification in the compensation and determined the compensation as under:

For Dry land : Rs.5000/- per cent
For Chira land : Rs.2500/- per cent
For Wet land : Rs.500/- per cent

The appellant felt aggrieved by the order passed by the High Court and filed review petition in the High Court. By order dated 02.09.2003, the High Court disposed of the review petition and made partial modification in the compensation as under:

For Dry land : Rs.8000/- per cent
For Chira land : No increase
For Wet land : No increase

The original appellant (landowner) felt aggrieved by the order of the High Court passed in main appeal as well as in the review petition, filed appeal by way of Special Leave in Supreme Court.

While partly allowing the appeal the court said that:

"17) Even otherwise on perusal of the entire record of the case and the findings of all the Courts below, we are of the opinion that the findings recorded by the Reference Court in the earlier round of litigation awarding Rs. 2000/- per cent for the wet land though set aside by the High Court in the earlier round yet it deserves to be restored again.

18) In other words, in our view, the award of Rs.2000/- per cent for the wet land appears to be just, proper and reasonable keeping in view the nature of the land, its surroundings and location and similarity with the land owned by other landowners to whom compensation was awarded at the rate of Rs.2000/- per cent. In our opinion, it represents correct market value of the wet land on the date of acquisition (25.11.1980) and was, therefore, rightly determined by the Reference Court in cases of other landowners in relation to their lands acquired in these proceedings."

"20) In this view of the matter, we are of the considered view that the appellants are entitled to claim compensation for their wet land at the rate of Rs. 2000/- per cent in place of Rs. 500/- per cent determined by the High Court in the impugned order. As a necessary consequence, the appellants are also entitled for other statutory compensation payable under the Act keeping in view the enhancement made by this Court."

 

Read the Judgment of Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 6281-6282 of 2009, K.S. Rajan (D) Through LRs V. The State of Kerala & Anr dated 10.8.2018

 

 

About Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap