IBC 2016 | Regulatory oversight

Section 218 IBC: Investigation of Insolvency Professionals and Information Utilities

Section 218 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) empowers the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) to order an inspection or investigation into an insolvency professional agency, an insolvency professional or an information utility. The section specifies when an inquiry may begin, the investigating authority's powers, safeguards for records and the requirement to report findings to the Board.

At a glance: An investigation may follow a complaint under Section 217 or arise where the Board has reasonable grounds to believe that the Code, rules, regulations or Board directions have been contravened. An investigation is not, by itself, a finding of misconduct.

Section 218: Investigation of insolvency professional agency or its member or information utility

The six subsections of Section 218 establish the following legal framework:

Section 218(1): Grounds for inspection or investigation

On receiving a complaint under Section 217, or where it has reasonable grounds to believe that an insolvency professional agency, insolvency professional or information utility has breached the IBC, rules, regulations or directions issued under it, the Board may issue a written order appointing one or more persons as an investigating authority. The order may direct an inspection or investigation.

Section 218(2): Time and manner

The inspection or investigation must be carried out within the time and in the manner specified by applicable regulations. The detailed procedure depends on the category of regulated entity and the relevant IBBI regulations.

Section 218(3): Requisition of documents and information

During an inquiry, the investigating authority may require another person likely to hold relevant documents, records or information to furnish them. That person is legally bound to comply. Safeguard: the investigating authority must provide detailed reasons before requiring that person to furnish the material.

Section 218(4): Entry, search and seizure

Where there is reason to believe relevant material may be found at a building or place, the investigating authority may enter and seize documents, records or information, or take extracts or copies. The statutory provision refers to Section 100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, insofar as applicable. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) replaced the CrPC from 1 July 2024; its corresponding search procedure appears in Section 103. The interaction of the IBC's statutory cross-reference with the successor law should be assessed under applicable repeal-and-savings and interpretation provisions.

Section 218(5): Custody and return of seized material

Seized books, registers, documents and records may be retained only for the period the investigating authority considers necessary, not beyond conclusion of the investigation. The material must then be returned to the person from whose custody or control it was seized. Identification marks may be placed on it before return.

Section 218(6): Investigation report

The investigating authority must submit a detailed inspection or investigation report to the Board. Further regulatory steps, if warranted, are governed by the applicable provisions and procedural safeguards.

Powers and safeguards under Section 218

Power or requirementLegal safeguard or condition
Appoint investigating authorityWritten order of the Board under Section 218(1)
Inspect or investigateApplicable time limits and procedure prescribed by regulations
Request third-party recordsRelevant material; detailed reasons provided to the person concerned
Enter premises and seize recordsReason to believe records are present; applicable statutory search safeguards
Keep seized recordsOnly as necessary and not after conclusion of investigation
Report findingsDetailed report submitted to the IBBI

How an IBBI investigation generally proceeds

  1. Trigger: a Section 217 complaint or reasonable grounds for the Board to suspect a regulatory contravention.
  2. Authorization: the Board appoints an investigating authority by written order.
  3. Inquiry: inspection of relevant conduct and records, requests for information and, where legally justified, search or seizure.
  4. Safeguards: compliance with prescribed procedure, reasons for third-party requisitions and limits on retaining seized records.
  5. Report: findings are submitted to the Board; any subsequent action follows the relevant legal procedure.

Parties should preserve correspondence, transaction records, engagement documents, reports and other potentially relevant material. The precise steps and deadlines are determined by the applicable regulations and the terms of a lawful notice or order.

Section 196: sets out the powers and functions of the Board, including regulatory oversight. Section 217: permits an aggrieved person to lodge a complaint about an insolvency professional agency, insolvency professional or information utility. Section 219: concerns show-cause notice to insolvency professional agency or its member or information utility following investigation. Section 220: concerns the disciplinary committee. Section 221: concerns appeals against orders of the Board. These stages must not be treated as automatic consequences of every investigation.

Frequently asked questions

Who can be investigated under Section 218?

An insolvency professional agency, insolvency professional or information utility may be inspected or investigated under the section.

Is a complaint necessary before the IBBI can investigate?

No. A complaint under Section 217 is one trigger. The Board may also act where it has reasonable grounds to believe that a relevant legal or regulatory contravention has occurred.

Can an investigating authority demand documents from a third party?

Yes, if that person is likely to possess relevant records or information. Section 218(3) requires detailed reasons to be provided before demanding such material.

Can records be retained indefinitely?

No. Under Section 218(5), seized records cannot be retained beyond the conclusion of the investigation and must be returned in accordance with that provision.

Does an investigation automatically establish wrongdoing?

No. Investigation is a fact-finding process. Any further disciplinary action must follow the applicable statutory and regulatory procedure.

Official legislation and regulatory resources

This article explains the statutory framework for general information. Readers should consult the current text of the IBC, relevant IBBI regulations and applicable orders for a particular proceeding.