LawDadi - Indian law and legal updates
Home / Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code / Section 64
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Section 64 IBC: Expeditious Disposal of Applications

Section 64 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) promotes prompt decisions in insolvency matters. It requires the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to explain delays beyond time limits specified in the Code, provides a limited mechanism for extending such periods, and restricts injunctions against the exercise of their statutory powers.

Key point: Section 64(1) provides for a possible extension of not more than 10 days by the specified tribunal head after reasons for delay are recorded. This is not a general power to extend every IBC deadline or an automatic extension for litigants.

Section 64: Statutory provisions

Section 64(1) - Delay in disposal of applications or passing orders

Where an application is not disposed of or an order is not passed within the period specified in this Code, the National Company Law Tribunal or the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be, shall record the reasons for not doing so within the period so specified; and the President of the National Company Law Tribunal or the Chairperson of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be, may, after taking into account the reasons so recorded, extend the period specified in the Act but not exceeding ten days.

Section 64(2) - Restriction on injunctions

No injunction shall be granted by any court, tribunal or authority in respect of any action taken, or to be taken, in pursuance of any power conferred on the National Company Law Tribunal or the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal under this Code.

The wording above is reproduced from the statutory text. Consult the official India Code record and the IBBI-published Code text for primary-source reference.

Meaning and legal effect of Section 64(1)

When the Code sets a time limit for deciding an application or making an order, and the relevant tribunal cannot meet it, the tribunal must record reasons for the delay. The NCLT President or NCLAT Chairperson, as applicable, may consider those reasons and extend the specified period by up to ten days. The word may indicates discretion; the provision does not guarantee an extension.

The ten-day provision concerns the particular period for disposal or passing an order addressed by Section 64. It should not be confused with the separate statutory rules governing insolvency resolution timelines, appeals, condonation of delay or exclusion of periods under other provisions.

Meaning and legal effect of Section 64(2)

Sub-section (2) bars courts, tribunals and authorities from granting injunctions concerning actions taken or proposed in exercise of powers conferred on the NCLT or NCLAT under the IBC. It supports the Code's objective of avoiding interruptions to insolvency adjudication. It does not mean that all tribunal orders are immune from scrutiny: the Code separately provides appellate remedies, including appeals under Sections 61 and 62, subject to their conditions.

Important legal terms

NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal)
The adjudicating authority for corporate insolvency and liquidation matters under Section 60, subject to the Code's provisions.
NCLAT (National Company Law Appellate Tribunal)
The appellate tribunal hearing eligible appeals from NCLT orders under Section 61.
Injunction
A judicial or tribunal order restraining a person or body from carrying out an act. Section 64(2) addresses injunctions against the specified exercise of IBC tribunal powers.
Expeditious disposal
Timely determination of an application or proceeding, consistent with the time-bound framework established by the IBC.
Adjudicating Authority
For corporate persons, the NCLT identified under Section 60 of the Code.
  • Section 7: Application by a financial creditor to initiate corporate insolvency resolution; contains a statutory framework for the admission decision.
  • Sections 9 and 10: Applications by operational creditors and corporate applicants respectively.
  • Section 12: Time limits for completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process, subject to its statutory scheme and judicial interpretation.
  • Section 60: Jurisdiction of the NCLT for corporate persons and related matters.
  • Section 61: Appeals to the NCLAT.
  • Section 62: Appeals to the Supreme Court on questions of law.
  • Section 63: Exclusion of civil court jurisdiction over matters within NCLT or NCLAT jurisdiction.

In practice, parties should track the relevant deadline under the particular IBC provision and applicable procedural rules, rather than assuming that Section 64 itself creates a uniform deadline for every application. Any challenge to an order should follow the applicable statutory appeal route.

Frequently asked questions

Does Section 64 require NCLT and NCLAT to record reasons for delay?

Yes. When an application or order is not disposed of within the period specified by the Code, Section 64(1) requires reasons for the delay to be recorded.

Can the time period be extended by more than ten days under Section 64(1)?

No. The extension contemplated by this subsection cannot exceed ten days. Other timelines and their treatment depend on the specific legal provision and applicable case law.

Who may grant the extension?

The President of the NCLT or the Chairperson of the NCLAT, as applicable, may grant the limited extension after considering the recorded reasons.

Does the injunction bar remove the right to appeal?

No. Section 64(2) addresses injunctions; eligible appeals remain governed by Sections 61 and 62 and other applicable provisions.

Official legal resources

For the full legislation, see The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Legal information only. Statutory amendments, procedural rules and binding judgments should be checked for the facts and date of the relevant proceeding.