LawDadi - Indian law and legal updates
Home / CrPC / Section 277
Indian criminal procedure | Updated 18 October 2026

Section 277 CrPC: Language of Record of Evidence and Section 312 BNSS

Section 277 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 prescribes the language in which witness evidence is recorded in warrant-case and Sessions trials. Its corresponding provision under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is Section 312 BNSS.

Current legal position: The BNSS came into force on 1 July 2024. Section 312 BNSS governs the language of evidence under Sections 310 and 311 BNSS, subject to the savings and transitional provisions in Section 531 BNSS for relevant pending proceedings.

Meaning and purpose of the provision

The rule ensures that oral testimony is faithfully incorporated into the judicial record, even when a witness speaks a language different from the language of the Court. It addresses the language of the original record, the preparation of a true translation and the authentication of that translation by the judicial officer.

Section 277 CrPC - Language of record of evidence

Section 277 applies where evidence is recorded under Section 275 CrPC (warrant-cases) or Section 276 CrPC (Sessions trials). Its statutory requirements are:

  1. Clause (a): If a witness gives evidence in the language of the Court, the evidence must be recorded in that language.
  2. Clause (b): If the witness gives evidence in another language, it may be recorded in that language where practicable. Otherwise, a true translation into the language of the Court must be prepared as the examination proceeds, signed by the Magistrate or presiding Judge, and included in the record.
  3. Clause (c): If the evidence is recorded in a language other than the language of the Court, a true translation into the Court language must be prepared as soon as practicable, signed by the Magistrate or presiding Judge, and included in the record.

Proviso: Where evidence is recorded in English under clause (b), the Court may dispense with its translation into the language of the Court if none of the parties requires the translation.

The clauses above explain the statutory requirements in plain language. For the enacted wording, consult the official legislation sources below.

Section 312 BNSS - Present corresponding provision

Section 312 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 retains substantially the same language-recording requirements. The updated cross-references are Section 310 BNSS (record in warrant-cases) and Section 311 BNSS (record in trial before a Court of Session).

SubjectCrPC, 1973BNSS, 2023
Language of record of evidenceSection 277Section 312
Record in warrant-casesSection 275Section 310
Record in Sessions trialsSection 276Section 311
Language of CourtsSection 272Section 307
Procedure after recording evidenceSection 278Section 313

How the language and translation rules operate

Witness speaks the language of the Court

The testimony must be recorded in that language. No separate translation is required merely because another language might be more familiar to a party.

Witness speaks another language

Where practicable, the testimony may be recorded in the language spoken by the witness. Otherwise, a true translation into the Court language must be prepared during the examination and signed by the Magistrate or presiding Judge.

Evidence recorded in another language

If the original testimony is recorded in a language different from the Court language, a true translation must be prepared as soon as practicable, authenticated by the Magistrate or presiding Judge, and placed on the record.

Exception for evidence recorded in English

The proviso permits the Court to dispense with a translation of evidence recorded in English when none of the parties requires a translation into the Court language. It is a judicial discretion, not an automatic exemption.

Pending cases and Section 531 BNSS

Section 531 BNSS repeals the CrPC while saving specified pending appeals, applications, trials, inquiries and investigations that existed immediately before commencement. Those proceedings are to continue under the CrPC in accordance with the saving provision. The procedural code applicable to a particular matter must therefore be assessed by its procedural history and the statutory transition rules.

Practical significance for criminal trials

Accurate language recording reduces disputes about what a witness actually said. Courts and practitioners should distinguish between the language in which evidence was originally recorded and the authenticated translation, check that the required judicial signature is present, and consider the related provisions governing reading over evidence and interpretation to the accused.

Frequently asked questions

What is the BNSS equivalent of Section 277 CrPC?

Section 312 BNSS is the corresponding provision dealing with the language of recorded witness evidence.

Must testimony always be recorded in the Court language?

No. Evidence may be recorded in the witness's language where practicable, subject to the statutory requirements for a true translation into the Court language.

Can translation of English evidence be waived?

Yes. Under the statutory proviso, the Court may dispense with the translation where evidence is recorded in English and no party requires a translation into the Court language.

Official statutory sources

This article provides general statutory information. Check the latest notified amendments and the applicable procedural law before relying on a provision in a specific case.