Indian Criminal Procedure | Updated October 2026

Section 29 CrPC and Section 23 BNSS: Sentences Magistrates May Pass

The sentencing powers of Magistrates in India depend on the class of court, the punishment authorised for the offence and the applicable procedural law. Section 29 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) prescribed the earlier limits. Section 23 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) sets out the corresponding current framework.

Current legal position: The BNSS came into force on 1 July 2024. Section 531 contains repeal and savings provisions for specified pending matters. The applicable law, including any special or state legislation, must be checked for each case.

Section 23 BNSS: Present sentencing powers

Section 23, titled "Sentences which Magistrates may pass", provides the following general sentencing limits:

CourtMaximum imprisonmentMaximum fineOther powers
Chief Judicial MagistrateUp to 7 yearsAs authorised by applicable lawCannot impose death or life imprisonment
Judicial Magistrate First ClassUp to 3 yearsRs. 50,000Imprisonment, fine, both, or community service as permitted
Judicial Magistrate Second ClassUp to 1 yearRs. 10,000Imprisonment, fine, both, or community service as permitted

Section 23(1): Chief Judicial Magistrate

A Chief Judicial Magistrate may impose a sentence authorised by law, but not death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment exceeding seven years. The underlying offence must itself permit the punishment awarded.

Section 23(2): Magistrate of the First Class

A Magistrate of the First Class may impose imprisonment for up to three years, a fine up to Rs. 50,000, or both, or community service. These are limits on the court's general sentencing authority, not automatic penalties for every offence.

Section 23(3): Magistrate of the Second Class

A Magistrate of the Second Class may impose imprisonment for up to one year, a fine up to Rs. 10,000, or both, or community service, subject to the substantive offence and other applicable law.

Meaning of community service

The Explanation to Section 23 defines community service as work ordered by a court for a convicted person to perform as punishment for the benefit of the community, without remuneration. Whether it is available in a particular case depends on the applicable statutory provisions.

Section 29 CrPC: Earlier statutory provisions

Section 29 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was titled "Sentences which Magistrates may pass". Its four subsections provided:

  • Section 29(1): The Chief Judicial Magistrate could impose any lawful sentence except death, life imprisonment or imprisonment exceeding seven years.
  • Section 29(2): A Magistrate of the First Class could impose imprisonment up to three years, a fine up to Rs. 10,000, or both, under the central provision as amended.
  • Section 29(3): A Magistrate of the Second Class could impose imprisonment up to one year, a fine up to Rs. 5,000, or both, under the central provision as amended.
  • Section 29(4): A Chief Metropolitan Magistrate had the powers of a Chief Judicial Magistrate, while a Metropolitan Magistrate had those of a Magistrate of the First Class.

The fine limits of Rs. 10,000 and Rs. 5,000 under the central CrPC were introduced by Act 25 of 2005, Section 5, effective 23 June 2006, replacing the earlier Rs. 5,000 and Rs. 1,000 limits respectively.

State amendments to Section 29 CrPC

The following state amendments were included in the earlier law and remain relevant when examining historical cases or saved proceedings. Their present applicability and interaction with the BNSS require verification against current state legislation and notifications.

Manipur

Manipur Act 3 of 1985, Section 4(2) and the Schedule, inserted Section 29(2A), providing that a Specified Executive Magistrate could impose imprisonment up to two years, a fine up to Rs. 2,000, or both.

Maharashtra

Maharashtra Act 27 of 2007, Section 2, substituted the fine limits in Section 29(2) and (3) for the state's application of the CrPC: Rs. 50,000 for a Magistrate of the First Class and Rs. 10,000 for a Magistrate of the Second Class.

Arunachal Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh Act 3 of 2019, Section 12, substituted the fine limits in Section 29(2) and (3) in the state's application of the CrPC: Rs. 1,00,000 for a Magistrate of the First Class and Rs. 25,000 for a Magistrate of the Second Class.

How sentencing limits operate

The powers of a Magistrate do not themselves create a punishment for an offence. A sentence must be authorised by the relevant substantive law, and the court must have jurisdiction. Special statutes, lawful transfers or committal procedures, and applicable state modifications may affect the outcome.

For imprisonment imposed in default of payment of a fine, consult Section 24 BNSS (corresponding to Section 30 CrPC). For sentencing after conviction for several offences at one trial, consult Section 25 BNSS (corresponding to Section 31 CrPC).

Frequently asked questions

Can a Chief Judicial Magistrate impose life imprisonment?

No. Section 23(1) BNSS excludes life imprisonment and the death penalty, and bars imprisonment exceeding seven years.

What is the maximum fine a First Class Magistrate may impose under BNSS?

Under the general provision in Section 23(2), the limit is Rs. 50,000, subject to the law governing the offence and any applicable special provisions.

Does BNSS allow community service?

Yes. Section 23 expressly includes community service among the sentencing options of First Class and Second Class Magistrates and defines it as unpaid work benefiting the community.

Official legislation and references

This article is general legal information, not advice for an individual proceeding. Check the latest statute, notifications, and binding judicial decisions before relying on a sentencing limit.