Criminal Procedure Law

CrPC Section 327: Court to Be Open and In-Camera Trials

Section 327 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 established the principle that criminal courts are ordinarily open to the public, with safeguards for sensitive proceedings. The corresponding current provision is Section 366 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS).

Updated: 18 October 2026

Current legal position: The BNSS came into force on 1 July 2024 and repealed the CrPC, subject to the savings provisions in BNSS Section 531. Proceedings already pending immediately before commencement may continue under the earlier CrPC in accordance with that provision.

What does an open criminal court mean?

An open court is a courtroom where members of the public may ordinarily attend and observe judicial proceedings, subject to available space and lawful restrictions. Open hearings promote transparency and public confidence in the administration of justice. This does not give an unrestricted right to enter every hearing or publish protected information.

Section 327 CrPC: Explanation of the legal provisions

Sub-section (1): General public access

The place where a criminal court conducts an inquiry or trial is deemed an open court. The public may enter to the extent that the courtroom can conveniently accommodate them. The presiding Judge or Magistrate may, at any stage, exclude the public generally or particular persons from a case when considered appropriate.

Sub-section (2): Mandatory in-camera proceedings

For specified rape and sexual offences under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the inquiry and trial must take place in camera, meaning the general public is excluded. The court may permit particular persons to attend, including on a party's application. As far as practicable, such trials are to be conducted by a woman Judge or Magistrate.

Under the former IPC framework, the provision referred to rape and offences under Sections 376, 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, 376DB and 376E, as applicable to the amended text.

Sub-section (3): Restrictions on reporting and publication

Printing or publishing matters relating to proceedings conducted under sub-section (2) requires prior permission of the court. The statutory proviso allows the restriction on publication of rape trial proceedings to be lifted subject to confidentiality of the names and addresses of the parties. Other laws protecting victims' identities must also be observed.

Section 366 BNSS: The law applicable from 1 July 2024

Section 366 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 retains the open-court principle and the power of the court to restrict attendance. Its in-camera trial requirement expressly covers specified offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO).

Legal subjectCurrent statutory provision
Open court and discretionary exclusionBNSS Section 366(1)
Mandatory in-camera inquiry and trialBNSS Section 366(2): BNS Sections 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 70 and 71; POCSO Sections 4, 6, 8 and 10
Permission for particular persons to attend; woman presiding officer where practicableProvisos to BNSS Section 366(2)
Publication restrictions and confidentialityBNSS Section 366(3) and its proviso
Repeal and savings for pending mattersBNSS Section 531

The BNS provisions referenced in Section 366(2) address categories including rape, aggravated rape, punishment where rape causes death or persistent vegetative state, sexual intercourse by a husband during separation, sexual intercourse by a person in authority, gang rape and repeat offenders. POCSO Sections 4 and 6 concern punishments for penetrative and aggravated penetrative sexual assault, while Sections 8 and 10 concern punishments for sexual assault and aggravated sexual assault.

Practical effect: A member of the public can normally observe an ordinary criminal trial, but not a statutorily protected in-camera sexual offence trial. Reporting an in-camera proceeding without the court's required permission may violate the law.

State amendments to the former CrPC Section 327

State-specific amendments to the CrPC may be relevant to older proceedings governed by the saved law. Their present applicability must be checked against the relevant State enactments and the BNSS transitional provisions.

Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh Act 25 of 2015, Section 12 expanded the former Section 327(2) wording to cover sexual harassment, outraging the modesty of a woman and additional IPC offences, including Sections 354, 354A, 354B, 354C, 354D, 354E, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376E, 376F, 509, 509A and 509B as specified in the State amendment. The amendment's operation in a particular saved case requires verification.

Arunachal Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh Act 3 of 2019, Section 19 amended the offence references in former Section 327(2), including references to IPC Sections 376AA and 376DA. Its effect should likewise be examined in the context of the relevant proceedings and applicable savings.

Legislative history of CrPC Section 327

Frequently asked questions

Is every criminal court hearing open to the public?

No. Open hearings are the general rule, but judges can restrict access and specified sexual offence proceedings must be held in camera.

What replaced CrPC Section 327?

Section 366 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is the corresponding provision from 1 July 2024, subject to the repeal and savings rules.

Can the media publish details of an in-camera rape trial?

Publication of matters relating to proceedings covered by Section 366(2) requires previous permission of the court, and applicable identity-protection rules must be respected.

Does Section 327 CrPC still matter?

Yes. It may remain relevant to proceedings preserved under Section 531 of the BNSS and to interpretation of older cases.

Official legislation and further reading

This article provides general legal information. The authoritative statutory text, applicable State amendments and judicial orders govern individual cases.