Home / CrPC / Section 484
Indian criminal procedure | Updated 19 October 2026

Section 484 CrPC: Repeal and Savings - Meaning, Amendments and Section 531 BNSS

Section 484 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 governed the transition from the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. Since 1 July 2024, Section 531 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) governs the repeal of the 1973 Code and preserves specified pending proceedings and legal acts.

Current law: The CrPC, 1973 has been repealed by Section 531(1) BNSS. Section 484 CrPC remains important for interpreting the earlier transition from the 1898 Code, historical cases and saved legal consequences. The applicable procedure for any particular case depends on the relevant commencement and savings provisions.

What does repeal and savings mean?

Repeal means the legislative withdrawal of an earlier enactment. A savings provision specifies which pending proceedings, acts, orders, powers or other legal consequences continue despite that repeal. Such provisions help avoid disruption when a new procedural law replaces an earlier one.

Section 484 CrPC took effect with the 1973 Code on 1 April 1974. It repealed the 1898 Code but expressly protected specified pending matters and prior legal actions. The original provision is available in the official India Code record of the CrPC.

Section 484 CrPC: statutory provisions and explanation

Sub-section (1): repeal of the 1898 Code

The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (5 of 1898), was repealed by the 1973 Code.

Sub-section (2)(a): pending proceedings

Appeals, applications, trials, inquiries and investigations pending immediately before commencement of the 1973 Code were to continue under the 1898 Code as it stood before commencement. The proviso made an exception for pending inquiries under Chapter XVIII of the old Code: these were to be dealt with under the 1973 Code.

Sub-section (2)(b): continuity of earlier official acts

Existing notifications, proclamations, conferred powers, prescribed forms, local jurisdictions, sentences, orders, rules and appointments made under the 1898 Code were treated as made under corresponding provisions of the 1973 Code. Appointments as Special Magistrates were expressly excluded from this saving.

Sub-section (2)(c): earlier sanctions and consents

A sanction or consent given under the 1898 Code, where proceedings had not yet commenced, was treated as given under the corresponding provisions of the 1973 Code. Proceedings could therefore be initiated on that basis.

Sub-section (2)(d): prosecutions against certain Rulers

The old Code continued to apply to prosecutions against a Ruler within the meaning of Article 363 of the Constitution. This is a specific historical saving, not a general exception for public officials.

Sub-section (3): expired limitation periods

An application or proceeding already time-barred under the 1898 Code could not be revived merely because the 1973 Code prescribed a longer period or allowed an extension of time.

These explanations preserve the substance of all three sub-sections, including the proviso and clauses (a) through (d). For authoritative statutory wording, consult the official CrPC text (PDF).

Uttar Pradesh amendments to Section 484 CrPC

Uttar Pradesh Act 16 of 1976, Section 10

The state amendment inserted clause (e) into Section 484(2), deemed to have been inserted from the relevant commencement. It continued the United Provinces Borstal Act, 1938, the United Provinces First Offenders' Probation Act, 1938, and the Uttar Pradesh Children Act, 1951 until altered, repealed or amended by competent authority. It also provided that Section 360 CrPC would not apply in Uttar Pradesh and that Section 361 would operate with references adapted to the corresponding state enactments.

Current-status caution: These are historical amendment terms. The continued operation of any named state enactment must be assessed in light of subsequent repeal, replacement and the present law; the historical wording alone does not establish that each Act remains in force today.

Uttar Pradesh Act 1 of 1984, Section 11

A further proviso to Section 484(2)(a) applied Section 326 CrPC, as amended in Uttar Pradesh in 1976, to specified trials pending before a Court of Session both at commencement of the 1973 Code and at commencement of the 1983 Uttar Pradesh amendment legislation. The original state amendment citation is preserved here for historical reference.

Section 531 BNSS: the current repeal and savings law

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Act 46 of 2023), commenced on 1 July 2024. Section 531 is the corresponding current provision. Its main rules are:

  • Section 531(1): repeals the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
  • Section 531(2)(a): preserves the CrPC procedure for an appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation pending immediately before BNSS commencement.
  • Section 531(2)(b): carries forward specified notifications, proclamations, powers, forms, jurisdictions, sentences, orders, rules and appointments under corresponding BNSS provisions, excluding appointments as Special Magistrates.
  • Section 531(2)(c): preserves qualifying sanctions and consents given under the CrPC before commencement of proceedings.
  • Section 531(3): prevents an already-expired limitation period from being revived merely by a longer BNSS period or an extension provision.

Unlike the earlier Section 484 CrPC, Section 531 BNSS does not reproduce the historical exception for Chapter XVIII inquiries under the 1898 Code or the clause concerning Rulers under Article 363. Read the official BNSS text on India Code and the Ministry of Home Affairs new criminal laws page.

Practical application of the savings rules

Proceeding already pending on 1 July 2024

Where an investigation, inquiry, trial, application or appeal was pending immediately before commencement of the BNSS, Section 531(2)(a) generally directs its continuation under the CrPC, 1973. The precise classification and procedural position of the matter can affect the analysis.

Order or notification issued before commencement

An existing order or notification made under the CrPC may continue by virtue of Section 531(2)(b), insofar as it falls within that clause and the corresponding BNSS framework.

Limitation already expired

A person cannot rely solely on a longer limitation period in the BNSS to reopen a procedural step that was already time-barred before commencement. Section 531(3) expressly addresses that situation.

Frequently asked questions

Is Section 484 CrPC still the current repeal provision?

No. Section 484 was part of the repealed CrPC, 1973. Section 531 BNSS now addresses repeal and savings of the CrPC.

Does every criminal case automatically move to BNSS procedure?

No. Section 531 BNSS expressly saves several categories of proceedings pending immediately before 1 July 2024. The applicable law must be determined from the facts and the relevant savings provisions.

Did Section 484 CrPC repeal the 1973 Code?

No. Section 484 CrPC repealed the 1898 Code. Section 531 BNSS subsequently repealed the 1973 Code.

Official legal references

This article provides general legal information. The application of transitional rules, state amendments and savings clauses depends on the facts, applicable notifications and judicial decisions.