Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 • Corporate insolvency
Section 44: Orders in Case of Preferential Transactions
Section 44 explains the remedies the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) may order after an application under Section 43 establishes an avoidable preferential transaction. It also protects certain persons who acted in good faith and gave value.
Legal guide | Reviewed 21 October 2026
What does Section 44 provide?
Under Section 43(1), the resolution professional or liquidator applies to the Adjudicating Authority to avoid a preferential transaction. Section 44 then gives the Authority a range of restorative orders. For corporate persons, the Adjudicating Authority is ordinarily the NCLT under Section 60. The purpose is to reverse an improper advantage and, where appropriate, restore property or value to the corporate debtor's estate.
A preference is assessed under Section 43, including the nature of the transfer, its effect compared with the distribution priority in Section 53, the statutory exceptions, and the relevant look-back period. Section 44 concerns the relief available; it does not make every pre-insolvency transfer automatically void.
Orders available under Section 44(a) to (g)
On an application by the resolution professional or liquidator under Section 43(1), the Adjudicating Authority may make one or more of the following orders:
- Clause (a) - Return of transferred property. Require property transferred in connection with the preference to vest in the corporate debtor.
- Clause (b) - Tracing proceeds or money. Require property representing the proceeds of sale of transferred property, or the application of transferred money, to vest in the corporate debtor.
- Clause (c) - Release of security. Release or discharge, wholly or partly, a security interest created by the corporate debtor.
- Clause (d) - Repayment of benefits. Require a person who benefited from the preference to pay an amount, as directed, to the liquidator or resolution professional.
- Clause (e) - Guarantor obligations. Impose new or revived financial or operational debt obligations on a guarantor where the preference had released or discharged the relevant obligation, in whole or part.
- Clause (f) - Replacement security. Provide security or a charge on property for obligations arising under the order, with the same priority as the security or charge that the preference had released or discharged.
- Clause (g) - Treatment of resulting claims. Determine the extent to which affected persons may prove financial or operational debts in liquidation or the corporate insolvency resolution process, where those debts arose from or were released or discharged by the preference.
These are statutory powers exercisable by the Adjudicating Authority; the particular order depends on the transaction and the evidence before it.
Proviso: Protection of good-faith transactions for value
Section 44 limits the reach of avoidance orders in two important situations:
- Interest acquired from a person other than the corporate debtor: an order must not affect such an interest, or an interest derived from it, if acquired in good faith and for value.
- Benefit received in good faith and for value: an order must not require that recipient to pay a sum to the liquidator or resolution professional in respect of that benefit.
These protections are subject to the statutory presumptions explained below. Whether the recipient acted in good faith and provided value is a fact-sensitive inquiry.
Explanations I and II: When good faith may be presumed absent
Explanation I - Rebuttable presumption
For a person covered by the Explanation who acquired an interest from someone other than the corporate debtor or received a benefit from the preference, the law presumes that the interest or benefit was obtained otherwise than in good faith if the person:
- had sufficient information about the initiation or commencement of the corporate debtor's insolvency resolution process; or
- is a related party.
The presumption can be rebutted by showing the contrary. It should not be treated as an irrebuttable finding of misconduct.
Explanation II - Public announcement
A person is deemed to have sufficient information, or an opportunity to obtain it, where the public announcement of the corporate insolvency resolution process has been made under Section 13.
Official legal references
Check the statute, amendments, applicable rules and relevant orders before relying on any legal position:
- India Code - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India - Legal Framework
- IBBI - Notifications, regulations and circulars
- National Company Law Tribunal - Official website
This article is general legal information, not advice for a particular proceeding. The statutory text and applicable judicial decisions govern.
