Income Tax Act 1961 / Exempt income

Section 14A: Expenditure Relating to Exempt Income

Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 restricts deduction of expenses incurred in relation to income that does not form part of total taxable income. It applies to the tax years governed by that Act, with Rule 8D prescribing a calculation mechanism where its statutory preconditions are met.

Law update (October 2026): The Income-tax Act, 2025 applies from 1 April 2026. This page explains Section 14A and Rule 8D under the 1961 Act, including historical disputes and assessment years. For tax year 2026-27 onward, verify the corresponding provisions and rules of the 2025 Act rather than automatically applying the old section numbering.

Meaning and purpose of Section 14A

Section 14A prevents a taxpayer from reducing taxable income by claiming expenditure incurred in relation to income excluded from total income under the 1961 Act. For example, where an investment generates tax-exempt income, the expenditure properly attributable to that income is generally not deductible against taxable receipts.

Exempt income means income that does not form part of total income under the applicable tax law. Disallowance means an expense is added back or denied when computing taxable income. The exact treatment of dividends, capital gains, agricultural income and other receipts depends on the applicable year and statutory exemption.

Section 14A(1), (2) and (3) explained

Section 14A(1): General restriction

No deduction is allowed for expenditure incurred in relation to income that does not form part of total income under the Act. The expenditure must be examined in light of the actual accounts and applicable law; Section 14A is not a blanket denial of every expense merely because the taxpayer holds investments.

Section 14A(2): Assessing Officer's determination

Where the Assessing Officer, having regard to the assessee's accounts, is not satisfied with the correctness of the claimed expenditure attributable to exempt income, the officer may determine the disallowance using the prescribed method. The required examination and recording of dissatisfaction are material safeguards, and their application depends on the relevant law and case facts.

Section 14A(3): Claim that no expenditure was incurred

The determination mechanism also extends to a taxpayer who claims that no expenditure was incurred in relation to exempt income. Such a claim should be supported by accounting records and the facts of the business.

Historical protective proviso

The proviso restricted reopening or enhancement of certain assessments for assessment years beginning on or before 1 April 2001 solely through Section 14A. It is principally of historical relevance.

Rule 8D: How disallowance was calculated

Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 supplied the prescribed calculation for Section 14A(2). Its formula changed over time, so the version applicable to the relevant assessment year is essential.

PeriodBroad Rule 8D approach
Assessment years 2008-09 through 2016-17Included directly related expenditure, a prescribed interest allocation and 0.5% of average value of relevant investments, under the then-applicable formula.
From assessment year 2017-18 under the amended 1962 RulesDirect expenditure plus 1% of the annual average of the monthly averages of opening and closing balances of investments yielding exempt income, subject to the rule's overall cap. The earlier separate interest allocation limb was removed.

The amended Rule 8D(2) formula and cap must be read in full before computing an amount. A formula-based disallowance is not automatic merely because a taxpayer holds shares or other investments; the statutory conditions in Section 14A(2) and (3) must be considered.

Important amendments and legal developments

Introduction and effective date

Section 14A was inserted by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 1 April 1962. Sub-sections (2) and (3) were added by the Finance Act, 2006, effective from 1 April 2007, and Rule 8D was subsequently introduced. Courts have considered the year from which the prescribed formula can apply.

Finance Act, 2022 explanation

The Finance Act, 2022 added an Explanation clarifying that the section applies, and is deemed always to have applied, in cases where exempt income has not accrued, arisen or been received during the relevant previous year, provided expenditure has been incurred in relation to such exempt income. Litigation has addressed the temporal operation of this clarification and the treatment of years preceding the amendment. For an older assessment year, the applicable judgments and facts require individual examination.

Judicial principles

The Supreme Court's decision in Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT (2018) addressed the relationship between investments, dominant purpose and Section 14A. Other decisions have examined the Assessing Officer's satisfaction, availability of interest-free funds, and the scope of disallowance. Outcomes depend on the applicable assessment year and evidence.

Practical examples

Example 1: Direct cost

If an assessee pays an identifiable fee exclusively for managing an investment that produces exempt income, the relevant direct expenditure may be disallowed under Section 14A, subject to the applicable law.

Example 2: Mixed administrative expenses

Where staff and office resources support both taxable operations and exempt investments, the assessee should identify and document the relevant expenses. If the Assessing Officer is dissatisfied with the claim after examining the accounts, the prescribed computation may become relevant.

Example 3: No exempt income in the year

This is a disputed area for historical years because of the Finance Act, 2022 Explanation and case law. A taxpayer should not assume either that a disallowance always applies or that it can never apply; the assessment year and binding decisions matter.

Documentation and compliance checklist

Original Section 14A wording and amendment notes

The text below is retained from the original webpage for historical reference. It does not incorporate every later amendment and should not be treated as the complete current consolidated law.

Expand original statutory text and legislative notes

1, 2 (1) For the purposes of computing the total income under this Chapter, no deduction shall be allowed in respect of expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act.

3 (2) The Assessing Officer shall determine the amount of expenditure incurred in relation to such income which does not form part of the total income under this Act in accordance with such method as may be prescribed, if the Assessing Officer, having regard to the accounts of the assessee, is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of such expenditure in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act.

(3) The provisions of sub-section (2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act:

4 Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess under section 147 or pass an order enhancing the assessment or reducing a refund already made or otherwise increasing the liability of the assessee under section 154, for any assessment year beginning on or before the 1st day of April, 2001.
----------------------

1. Ins. by Act 14 of 2001, s. 11 (w.e.f. 1-4-1962).

2. Section 14A renumbered as sub-section (1) thereof by Act 21 of 2006, s. 7 (w.e.f. 1-4-2007).

3. Ins. by s. 7, ibid. (w.e.f. 1-4-2007).

4. Ins. by Act 20 of 2002, s. 10 (w.e.f. 11-5-2001).
 

Official legislation and resources

General legal information, updated 24 October 2026. Verify the consolidated statutory text, notifications and binding case law for the relevant tax year before filing a return or appeal.