Indian criminal law | Updated October 2026

IPC Section 180 and BNS Section 215: Refusing to Sign a Statement

Refusing to sign a statement is punishable only where the person made that statement and a public servant has legal authority to require the signature. The current provision is Section 215 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), corresponding to former Section 180 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).

At a glance: BNS Section 215 prescribes simple imprisonment up to three months, a fine up to Rs. 3,000, or both. The earlier IPC Section 180 provided the same imprisonment term but a maximum fine of Rs. 500.

1. Current law: Section 215 of the BNS

Section 215 is titled "Refusing to sign statement". It applies when a person refuses to sign a statement made by that person after being required to sign it by a public servant legally competent to demand the signature. The law does not make every unsigned document or every disagreement with an official a criminal offence.

The BNS came into force on 1 July 2024. The IPC provision remains relevant to conduct occurring before that date, subject to the applicable repeal and saving rules.

2. Essential ingredients of the offence

  1. A statement was made: The statement must have been made by the person asked to sign it.
  2. A public servant required the signature: The demand must come from a public servant acting in an official capacity.
  3. Legal competence: A law must authorise that public servant to require the statement to be signed in the circumstances.
  4. Refusal: The person refuses to sign despite a legally valid requirement.

The existence and scope of the statutory power to demand a signature are central. An unauthorised request cannot, by itself, satisfy this section.

3. Punishment and procedural classification

ProvisionMaximum imprisonmentMaximum fine
BNS Section 215 (current)Three months, simple imprisonmentRs. 3,000
IPC Section 180 (historical)Three months, simple imprisonmentRs. 500

Under the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the offence under BNS Section 215 is non-cognizable and bailable. The court competent to try the matter depends on whether the alleged offence occurred in court and on the applicable procedural provisions.

4. Important safeguard: Police investigation statements

BNSS Section 181 generally provides that a statement made to a police officer during an investigation, if reduced to writing, shall not be signed by the person making it. This is an important distinction: a police officer cannot rely on BNS Section 215 to compel a signature where the procedural law prohibits obtaining one.

Different rules may apply to statements recorded by a Magistrate or under another law. Whether a signature can lawfully be required must be assessed against the specific procedure governing the statement.

5. Practical illustrations

6. Difference from neighbouring provisions

BNS Section 213 (former IPC 178) concerns refusal to take an oath or affirmation when lawfully required. BNS Section 214 (former IPC 179) concerns refusal to answer questions when legally bound to state the truth. BNS Section 215 (former IPC 180) deals specifically with refusal to sign a statement made by the person.

7. Frequently asked questions

What is the current provision corresponding to IPC Section 180?

Section 215 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 corresponds to IPC Section 180 for offences governed by the new law.

What is the punishment under BNS Section 215?

Simple imprisonment for up to three months, a fine up to Rs. 3,000, or both.

Does every refusal to sign a document constitute an offence?

No. The statement must be made by the person, and a public servant must be legally competent to require its signature.

Must a police investigation statement be signed?

No. Under BNSS Section 181, a statement made to police during investigation and reduced to writing is generally not to be signed by its maker.

Is BNS Section 215 bailable?

Yes. It is classified as non-cognizable and bailable under the First Schedule to the BNSS.

8. Official legal references

Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information. The outcome in a particular matter depends on the facts, applicable procedural law and the date of the alleged act.