Indian criminal law | Updated 30 October 2026

IPC Section 227 and BNS Section 266: Violation of Condition of Remission of Punishment

A conditional remission may reduce or suspend the punishment a convicted person must serve, but it is subject to compliance with the conditions attached to the remission. Knowingly violating an accepted condition can trigger the consequence laid down by criminal law.

At a glance

Earlier provision: Section 227, Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Current corresponding provision: Section 266, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (in force from 1 July 2024).

Consequence: Original sentence, or its unserved remainder.

Classification: Cognizable and non-bailable under the BNSS First Schedule.

What is violation of a condition of remission?

Remission generally means a reduction of the period or extent of punishment without necessarily changing the nature of the conviction or sentence. A conditional remission is granted subject to specified requirements. Section 266 of the BNS addresses the knowing breach of a condition by a person who has accepted such remission.

Section 266 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

The provision states in substance that a person who has accepted a conditional remission and knowingly violates a condition is liable to the punishment originally imposed, if no part has been undergone, or to the part of that punishment not yet undergone, if some has already been served.

Historical IPC Section 227

Section 227 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, provided the same rule: Whoever, having accepted any conditional remission of punishment, knowingly violates any condition on which such remission was granted, shall be punished with the punishment to which he was originally sentenced, if he has already suffered no part of that punishment, and if he has suffered any part of that punishment, then with so much of that punishment as he has not already suffered.

IPC Section 227 remains relevant when examining conduct and proceedings governed by the law in force before 1 July 2024, subject to the applicable repeal and savings provisions. The BNS is the principal current penal statute for conduct within its temporal scope.

Essential ingredients of the offence

  1. Original sentence: A punishment must have been imposed for an offence.
  2. Conditional remission: The competent authority must have granted remission subject to one or more conditions.
  3. Acceptance: The person must have accepted the conditional remission.
  4. Knowing violation: A condition must have been breached knowingly. The mental element is important; the provision does not simply punish every inadvertent or disputed non-compliance.
  5. Proof of terms and breach: The remission order, its conditions, relevant communications and evidence of the alleged breach are central to the inquiry.

The actual wording of the remission order and any applicable statutory or constitutional provisions must be examined in each case.

Punishment under BNS Section 266

If no part of the sentence has been servedThe punishment to which the person was originally sentenced.
If part of the sentence has been servedOnly the remainder of the original punishment that has not already been undergone.
Cognizable or non-cognizableCognizable.
Bailable or non-bailableNon-bailable; bail is subject to applicable legal provisions and judicial consideration.
Court having jurisdictionThe court by which the original offence was triable, as specified in the BNSS First Schedule.

Section 266 does not specify a universal fixed term such as six months or two years. The consequence depends on the original sentence and how much of it has already been undergone. The procedural classification above is from the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Practical illustrations

Example 1: Breach after partial service

A person sentenced to four years has already served two years and is granted conditional remission. If the person accepts the remission and knowingly violates a valid condition, Section 266 contemplates the unserved portion of the original punishment, not a fresh four-year term in addition to the period already undergone.

Example 2: Breach before serving the sentence

A convicted person accepts conditional remission before serving any part of the punishment. If a condition is knowingly violated, the provision points to the original punishment.

Example 3: Disputed knowledge

A remission condition is alleged to have been breached, but the person disputes knowing the relevant condition. The requirement of a knowing violation makes evidence of the condition, its communication and the circumstances of the alleged breach significant.

These are simplified illustrations, not conclusions about any particular case.

Remission, commutation, suspension and pardon

Remission reduces the extent of punishment to be served; commutation substitutes one form of punishment for another; suspension temporarily stays execution of a sentence; and pardon is a distinct form of clemency. Their legal effects and sources of power are not interchangeable.

Relevant provisions may include Article 72 of the Constitution (President's clemency powers), Article 161 (Governor's clemency powers), and the applicable provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 dealing with suspension, remission and commutation of sentences. A conditional remission order must be read in its legal context.

Difference between IPC 227 and BNS 266

IPC Section 227 and BNS Section 266 are substantially equivalent in their description of the offence and its punishment. The main practical distinction is which criminal statute applies to the relevant conduct and proceedings.

Frequently asked questions

What is IPC Section 227?

IPC Section 227 punished a person who accepted a conditional remission of punishment and knowingly breached a condition. For offences governed by the new criminal law, the corresponding provision is BNS Section 266.

What is the punishment under BNS Section 266?

The person is liable to the original sentence if none has been served, or the remaining unserved portion if part has already been served. The provision does not prescribe a separate fixed imprisonment term.

Is BNS Section 266 cognizable and bailable?

It is cognizable and non-bailable under the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Which court tries the offence?

The court by which the original offence was triable, as specified in the BNSS First Schedule.

Does every breach of remission amount to this offence?

The provision requires acceptance of a conditional remission and a knowing violation of one of its conditions. Whether those elements are established depends on the remission order and the evidence.

Does IPC Section 227 still matter?

Yes. It remains relevant to historical conduct and proceedings governed by the earlier law, subject to applicable repeal and savings provisions.

Official legislation and reference material

Legal information only. Application of remission conditions, criminal liability and procedure depends on the relevant order, dates and facts.