Indian criminal law | Updated 30 October 2026

IPC Section 360: Kidnapping from India and Corresponding BNS Section 137

Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 defined kidnapping from India. Since 1 July 2024, the corresponding definition appears in Section 137(1)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).

Current legal position: The IPC has been repealed with effect from 1 July 2024, subject to statutory savings. For conduct occurring before that date, the IPC may remain relevant. For offences committed on or after that date, consult the BNS and applicable transitional provisions.

What did Section 360 IPC provide?

Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was titled Kidnapping from India. Its statutory definition was:

Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.

This provision defined the offence; punishment was separately prescribed by Section 363 IPC. The definition applied to the removal of a person beyond India's territorial limits without the legally required consent.

Section 137 BNS: Present law on kidnapping from India

Section 137(1) BNS identifies two categories of kidnapping: kidnapping from India and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 137(1)(a) retains the substance of the former Section 360 IPC definition: conveying a person beyond India's limits without that person's consent or the consent of someone legally authorised to consent on their behalf.

Section 137(2) BNS prescribes the punishment for kidnapping from India and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. The BNS consolidates the definition and general punishment that appeared in separate IPC sections.

Essential ingredients of kidnapping from India

  1. Conveyance of a person: The accused must have conveyed the person beyond India's limits.
  2. Crossing India's limits: The movement must extend beyond India; movement only within India does not, by itself, establish this particular form of kidnapping.
  3. Absence of legally valid consent: The person concerned, or a person legally authorised to consent on their behalf, must not have consented to the conveyance.

The facts, evidence, applicable law and validity of consent must be examined in each case. A mere allegation of international travel is not sufficient by itself to establish all elements of the offence.

Illustrative example

If A takes B across India's border without B's consent, and no legally authorised person has consented on B's behalf, the conduct may amount to kidnapping from India, subject to proof of the statutory elements and any applicable defence.

Punishment for kidnapping from India

LawProvisionGeneral punishment
Indian Penal Code, 1860Section 363 (read with Section 360)Imprisonment of either description up to seven years and liability to fine
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023Section 137(2) (read with Section 137(1)(a))Imprisonment of either description up to seven years and liability to fine

Under the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the general offence under Section 137(2) BNS is classified as cognizable, bailable and triable by a Magistrate of the first class. More serious conduct may attract other provisions and different consequences.

Difference from related kidnapping offences

Kidnapping from lawful guardianship: Section 137(1)(b) BNS addresses taking or enticing a child or a person of unsound mind out of lawful guardianship without the guardian's consent. Unlike kidnapping from India, crossing an international border is not required.

Abduction: Section 138 BNS concerns compelling a person by force or inducing a person by deceitful means to go from any place. Abduction and kidnapping have distinct statutory elements.

Aggravated kidnapping: Depending on the purpose and circumstances, additional provisions such as Section 140 BNS (including kidnapping or abduction for ransom or to murder) may be relevant. Their ingredients and punishments must be considered separately.

Frequently asked questions

Is Section 360 IPC still in force?

No. The IPC was repealed with effect from 1 July 2024, subject to savings. Section 360 remains relevant to offences and proceedings governed by the former law.

Which BNS section replaces Section 360 IPC?

Section 137(1)(a) BNS contains the corresponding definition. Section 137(2) provides the general punishment.

Is crossing a state boundary kidnapping from India?

No. Section 360 IPC and Section 137(1)(a) BNS concern conveyance beyond the limits of India, not merely movement between Indian states.

Official statutory references

This article provides general legal information, not advice for a particular case. Statutory amendments, commencement dates and case-specific facts should be verified before relying on any provision.