Home / Indian Penal Code / Section 441
Indian criminal law | Updated October 2026

IPC Section 441: Criminal Trespass - Meaning, BNS 329, Punishment and Bail

Criminal trespass concerns entry onto, or unlawful continued presence upon, property in another person's possession with a specified unlawful intention. The former Section 441 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) defined the offence. For conduct governed by the new criminal law from 1 July 2024, the corresponding definition appears in Section 329(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).

Criminal trespass at a glance

Earlier definition
IPC Section 441
Current definition
BNS Section 329(1)
Current punishment
BNS Section 329(3): up to 3 months or Rs. 5,000 fine or both
Classification
Cognizable and bailable
Trial
Any Judicial Magistrate

What did IPC Section 441 provide?

Section 441 IPC defined criminal trespass as follows:

Whoever enters into or upon property in the possession of another with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy any person in possession of such property, or having lawfully entered into or upon such property, unlawfully remains there with intent thereby to intimidate, insult or annoy any such person, or with intent to commit an offence, is said to commit "criminal trespass".

Section 441 was a definition; the former punishment for ordinary criminal trespass was in IPC Section 447. The former law remains relevant when analysing acts committed before commencement of the BNS, subject to applicable repeal and saving provisions.

Current law: BNS Section 329

Section 329(1) substantially carries forward the criminal trespass definition: a person commits criminal trespass by entering property possessed by another with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy a person in possession, or by unlawfully remaining there after a lawful entry with that intent.

Section 329(2) defines house-trespass when criminal trespass involves a building, tent or vessel used as a human dwelling, a building used for worship, or a building used to keep property. Even introducing part of the body can suffice as entry for house-trespass.

Section 329(3) punishes ordinary criminal trespass with imprisonment of either description up to three months, or a fine up to Rs. 5,000, or both. Section 329(4) separately punishes house-trespass with imprisonment up to one year, or a fine up to Rs. 5,000, or both.

Essential ingredients of criminal trespass

  1. Possession of another: the property is in another person's possession; ownership and possession are not always identical.
  2. Entry or continued presence: the accused enters the property, or enters lawfully but subsequently remains unlawfully.
  3. Specific intent: the entry or unlawful remaining is accompanied by intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy the person in possession.
  4. Proof from circumstances: the required intention must be established on the evidence; mere annoyance caused as a consequence does not, by itself, prove the requisite intent.

Practical illustrations

Example 1: A person enters a neighbour's enclosed premises specifically to threaten the occupant. Depending on proof of possession and intent, this may amount to criminal trespass.

Example 2: A visitor is initially admitted lawfully but refuses to leave and remains with the intention of intimidating the occupier. The second limb of the definition may apply.

Example 3: Two parties disagree about a boundary and one crosses it under a bona fide claim without any of the prohibited intentions. The dispute is not automatically criminal trespass; civil remedies and the evidence of intention must be considered.

Punishment, bail and trial

ProvisionMaximum punishmentPolice classificationBailTriable by
BNS 329(3): criminal trespass3 months, or Rs. 5,000 fine, or bothCognizableBailableAny Magistrate
BNS 329(4): house-trespass1 year, or Rs. 5,000 fine, or bothCognizableBailableAny Magistrate

These classifications are set out in the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). A cognizable classification does not dispense with the statutory safeguards governing arrest and investigation. Other offences, if established, can affect the applicable procedure.

Criminal trespass versus civil trespass

Unlawful interference with possession may give rise to a civil remedy, but a criminal charge requires proof of the additional intention specified by the criminal statute. In property disputes, relevant material can include possession records, communications, warnings to leave, witness accounts and surrounding conduct. A dispute over title is not, by itself, conclusive either way.

For more on associated offences, see IPC Section 442: House-trespass, IPC Section 447: Punishment for criminal trespass, and IPC Section 448: Punishment for house-trespass.

Official legislation and references

Frequently asked questions

What is criminal trespass under IPC Section 441?

Entering property possessed by another with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy the person in possession, or unlawfully remaining after lawful entry with the specified intent.

What is the corresponding BNS section?

Section 329(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 defines criminal trespass; section 329(3) prescribes punishment.

What is the punishment for criminal trespass under BNS?

Under BNS section 329(3), imprisonment up to three months, or a fine up to Rs. 5,000, or both.

Is criminal trespass bailable and cognizable?

Under the BNSS First Schedule, the offence under BNS section 329(3) is cognizable and bailable, and triable by any Judicial Magistrate.

Is every property dispute criminal trespass?

No. A property or possession dispute alone does not establish the specific criminal intent required for criminal trespass. The facts, entry or continued presence, and intent must be examined.

This article provides general legal information. The applicable law, evidence, procedural safeguards and possible remedies depend on the date and facts of each case.