Indian Criminal Law | Updated October 2026

IPC Section 499 Defamation: Meaning, Exceptions and BNS Section 356

Defamation under Indian criminal law concerns making or publishing an imputation about a person with the requisite intention or knowledge of harm to reputation. Former IPC Section 499 is now substantially reflected in Section 356(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).

Current legal position: The BNS came into force on 1 July 2024. Section 356 defines and penalises defamation. The former IPC Section 499 and Section 500 remain important when considering earlier conduct and transitional law. The applicable law depends on the facts and date of the alleged offence.

Definition of defamation: IPC Section 499 and BNS Section 356(1)

A person may commit criminal defamation by making or publishing an imputation concerning another person by spoken or written words, signs or visible representations, intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that the imputation will harm, that person's reputation, unless a statutory exception applies.

The explanations address imputations concerning deceased persons, companies and associations, ironic or alternative imputations, and the kinds of lowering of reputation recognised by law. Publication and the relevant mental element must be assessed in context.

Essential ingredients

  1. An imputation concerning an identifiable person or qualifying body.
  2. Making or publishing the imputation through words, signs or visible representations.
  3. Intention to harm reputation, or knowledge or reason to believe reputational harm would result.
  4. The alleged reputational harm and any applicable statutory exception must be evaluated in light of the full circumstances.

Ten statutory exceptions to criminal defamation

The BNS retains ten exceptions broadly corresponding to those historically contained in IPC Section 499. These are fact-sensitive defences; expressions such as good faith and public good have legal significance.

  1. Truth for public good: a true imputation where its publication is required for the public good.
  2. Public servants: good-faith opinions about public conduct and character revealed by that conduct.
  3. Public questions: good-faith opinions on conduct relating to public questions.
  4. Court proceedings: substantially true reports of judicial proceedings or their results.
  5. Decided cases: good-faith opinions on merits of decided cases and conduct of parties or witnesses within the permitted scope.
  6. Public performances: good-faith criticism of performances submitted to public judgment.
  7. Lawful authority: good-faith censure by a person with lawful authority within its scope.
  8. Accusation to authority: good-faith accusations made to persons having lawful authority over the subject.
  9. Protection of interests: good-faith imputations protecting one's own or another's interests or the public good.
  10. Caution: good-faith caution intended for the recipient's benefit, another interested person's benefit or the public good.

Punishment and classification under BNS Section 356

ProvisionLegal effect
BNS Section 356(1)Defines criminal defamation, explanations and exceptions.
BNS Section 356(2)Simple imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both, or community service.
BNS Section 356(3)Printing or engraving matter knowing it to be defamatory: simple imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both.
BNS Section 356(4)Sale or offer for sale of printed or engraved defamatory matter with requisite knowledge: simple imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both.
General classificationOrdinary criminal defamation is non-cognizable and bailable; jurisdiction and special cases must be checked under the BNSS First Schedule.

How a criminal defamation complaint is initiated

Section 222 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) governs prosecution for defamation. Ordinarily, a court takes cognizance on a complaint by a person aggrieved by the offence. The section also provides particular procedures for specified public functionaries in relation to their public functions. Filing, limitation, territorial jurisdiction and evidence requirements should be assessed in each case.

Criminal and civil defamation

Criminal defamation may result in statutory punishment if guilt is proved. Civil defamation is a separate remedy that may involve damages or other appropriate relief, depending on the law and circumstances. A statement being critical or unpleasant does not automatically establish either cause of action.

Defamation through social media and online publications

Posts, messages, videos and other electronic publications can potentially satisfy the publication element of defamation. The complete communication, context, audience, authenticity and statutory exceptions matter. Preserve original posts, URLs, dates and relevant electronic evidence in a lawful manner.

Historical IPC Section 499: explanations, illustrations and all ten exceptions

The following is the substantive historical content from the original page, retained for reference to the former Indian Penal Code. For current cases, read it alongside BNS Section 356 and the relevant savings provisions.

Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter excepted, to defame that person.

Explanation 1.-It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives.

Explanation 2.-It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such.

Explanation 3.-An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically, may amount to defamation.

Explanation 4.-No imputation is said to harm a person's reputation, unless that imputation directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person, or lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or of his calling, or lowers the credit of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of that person is in a loathsome state, or in a state generally considered as disgraceful.

Illustrations (a) A says- "Z is an honest man; he never stole B's watch"; intending to cause it to be believed that Z did steal B's watch.

This is defamation, unless it fall within one of the exceptions.

(b) A is asked who stole B's watch. A points to Z, intending to cause it to be believed that Z stole B's watch. This is defamation, unless it fall within one of the exceptions.

(c) A draws a picture of Z running away with B's watch, intending it to be believed that Z stole B's watch. This is defamation, unless it fall within one of the exceptions.

First Exception.-Imputation of truth which public good requires to be made or published.-It is not defamation to impute anything which is true concerning any person, if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or published. Whether or not it is for the public good is a question of fact.

Second Exception.-Public conduct of public servants.-It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of a public servant in the discharge of his public functions, or respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.

Third Exception.-Conduct of any person touching any public question.-It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of any person touching any public question, and respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.

Illustration It is not defamation in A to express in good faith any opinion whatever respepting Z's conduct in petitioning Government on a public question, in signing a requisition for a meeting on a public question, in presiding or attending at such meeting, in forming or joining any society which invites the public support, in voting or canvassing for a particular candidate for any situation in the efficient discharge of the duties of which the public is interested.

Fourth Exception.-Publication of reports of proceedings of courts.-It is not defamation to publish substantially true report of the proceedings of a Court of Justice, or of the result of any such proceedings.

Explanation.-A Justice of the Peace or other officer holding an enquiry in open Court preliminary to a trial in a Court of Justice, is a Court within the meaning of the above section.

Fifth Exception.-Merits of case decided in Court or conduct of witnesses and others concerned.-It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the merits of any case, civil or criminal, which has been decided by a Court of Justice, or respecting the conduct of any person as a party, witness or agent, in any such case, or respecting the character of such person, as far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.

Illustrations (a) A says-"I think Z's evidence on that trial is so contradictory that he must be stupid or dishonest." A is within this exception if he says this in good faith, inasmuch as the opinion which he expresses respects Z's character as it appears in Z's conduct as a witness, and no farther.

(b) But if A says-"I do not believe what Z asserted at that trial because I know him to be a man without veracity"; A is not within this exception, inasmuch as the opinion which express of Z's character, is an opinion not founded on Z's conduct as a witness.

Sixth Exception.-Merits of public performance.-It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion respecting the merits of any performance which its author has submitted to the judgment of the public, or respecting the character of the author so far as his character appears in such performance, and no further.

Explanation.-A performance may be submitted to the judgment of the public expressly or by acts on the part of the author which imply such submission to the judgment of the public.

Illustrations (a) A person who publishes a book, submits that book to the judgment of the public.

(b) A person who makes a speech in public, submits that speech to the judgment of the public.

(c) An actor or singer who appears on a public stage, submits his acting or singing to the judgment of the public.

(d) A says of a book published by Z-"Z’s book is foolish; Z must be a weak man. Z's book is indecent; Z must be a man of impure mind." A is within the exception, if he says this in good faith, inasmuch as the opinion which he expresses of Z respects Z's character only so far as it appears in Z's book, and no further.

(e) But if A says "I am not surprised that Z's book is foolish and indecent, for he is a weak man and a libertine." A is not within this exception, inasmuch as the opinion which he expresses of Z's character is an opinion not founded on Z's book.

Seventh Exception.-Censure passed in good faith by person having lawful authority over another.-It is not defamation in a person having over another any authority, either conferred by law or arising out of a lawful contract made with that other, to pass in good faith any censure on the conduct of that other in matters to which such lawful authority relates.

Illustration A Judge censuring in good faith the conduct of a witness, or of an officer of the Court; a head of a department censuring in good faith those who are under his orders, a parent censuring in good faith a child in the presence of other children; a schoolmaster, whose authority is derived from a parent, censuring in good faith a pupil in the presence of other pupils; a master censuring a servant in good faith for remissness in service; a banker censuring in good faith the cashier of his bank for the conduct of such cashier as such cashier- are within this exception.

Eighth Exception.-Accusation preferred in good faith to authorised person.-It is not defamation to prefer in good faith an accusation against any person to any of those who have lawful authority over that person with respect to the subject-matter of accusation.

Illustration If A in good faith accuses Z before a Magistrate; if A in good faith complains of the conduct of Z, a servant, to Z's master; if A in good faith complains of the conduct of Z, a child, to Z's father-A is within this exception.

Ninth Exception.-Imputation made in good faith by person for protection of his or other's interests.-It is not defamation to make an imputation on the character of another provided that the imputation be made in good faith for the protection of the interests of the person making it, or of any other person, or for the public good.

Illustrations (a) A, a shopkeeper, says to B, who manages his business-"Sell nothing to Z unless he pays you ready money, for I have no opinion of his honesty." A is within the exception, if he has made this imputation on Z in good faith for the protection of his own interests.

(b) A, a Magistrate, in making a report to his own superior officer, casts an imputation on the character of Z. Here, if the imputation is made in good faith, and for the public good, A is within the exception.

Tenth Exception.-Caution intended for good of person to whom conveyed or for public good.-

It is not defamation to convey a caution, in good faith, to one person against another, provided that such caution be intended for the good of the person to whom it is conveyed, or of some person in whom that person is interested, or for the public good.

Frequently asked questions

Is IPC Section 499 still the current law?

For conduct governed by the new criminal law from 1 July 2024, BNS Section 356 addresses defamation. IPC provisions and savings rules may remain relevant to earlier conduct.

Is defamation a criminal offence in India?

Yes. BNS Section 356 provides for criminal defamation, subject to its statutory elements and exceptions. Civil remedies may also be available.

Is every true statement protected?

Not automatically. The first statutory exception requires both truth and that making or publishing the imputation be for the public good.

What is the punishment for criminal defamation?

Under BNS Section 356(2), simple imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both, or community service may be imposed.

Official statutory sources

General legal information only. Statutory amendments, authoritative judgments and case-specific facts should be checked before taking action.