Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 | Court procedure

Section 148 CPC: Enlargement of Time by the Court

Section 148 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 empowers a civil court to extend time that the court itself has fixed or granted for an act under the Code. The provision expressly permits an extension after expiry of the original period, subject to its statutory wording and the principles governing judicial discretion.

Section 148 CPC - Statutory text

148. Enlargement of time. Where any period is fixed or granted by the Court for the doing of any act prescribed or allowed by this Code, the Court may, in its discretion, from time to time, enlarge such period not exceeding thirty days in total, even though the period originally fixed or granted may have expired.

The above provision reproduces the substance and complete operative wording of Section 148 in the supplied page, including the thirty-day limitation introduced by amendment. Consult the India Code official legislation portal for the Code, legislative updates and applicable amendments.

Meaning and scope of Section 148 CPC

What is "enlargement of time"?

Enlargement of time is an extension of a deadline fixed or allowed by a court for performing a procedural act under the CPC. Examples may include filing a document or completing a procedural step by a date set in a judicial order, provided the relevant rule permits extension.

Which deadlines are covered?

The wording requires a period fixed or granted by the court for an act prescribed or allowed by the CPC. It does not automatically extend every statutory deadline. A time limit prescribed independently by legislation may be subject to a separate provision and cannot simply be treated as a court-fixed period.

Is an extension a right?

No. The statute uses the words "may, in its discretion". The court considers the explanation for delay, diligence, prejudice to the other side, the nature of the procedural step, and the interests of justice. An applicant should not assume that filing a request suspends an existing deadline.

Can time be enlarged after expiry?

Yes. The final words expressly authorize enlargement even though the period originally fixed or granted may have expired. The court must still decide whether an extension is justified.

The thirty-day limit and inherent powers under Section 151

Section 148 states that the court may enlarge the relevant period not exceeding thirty days in total. The words "from time to time" permit more than one extension, but the total enlargement under the section is ordinarily constrained by the statutory cap.

The Supreme Court in Salem Advocate Bar Association, Tamil Nadu v. Union of India (2005) discussed the amendment and explained that the limit does not wholly eliminate the court's inherent power under Section 151 CPC to meet exceptional situations where the interests of justice require it. Similarly, Periyakkal v. Dakshyani (1983) addresses the court's power in the context of time fixed by judicial orders. These principles must be applied carefully to the facts; they do not create an unrestricted right to extensions beyond thirty days.

Important distinction: Section 151 is not a device to defeat an express statutory prohibition. The availability of inherent powers depends on the governing provision, the court's order and the circumstances of the case.

How to request enlargement of time

  1. Identify the order and deadline. Specify the court order fixing the time, the act required and the date of expiry.
  2. Explain the reason. Set out the relevant facts causing the delay and why it was not reasonably avoidable; support them with documents where appropriate.
  3. Specify the extension sought. State the number of additional days and the statutory basis, including Section 148 CPC where applicable.
  4. Address prejudice and diligence. Explain steps already taken and why the request is bona fide.
  5. Follow local rules. File the application in the pending proceeding, serve parties if required and comply with any costs or conditions imposed by the court.

Example: A court directs a party to produce specified records within ten days. The records are temporarily unavailable for reasons supported by correspondence. Before or after the ten-day period expires, the party may apply for a justified enlargement of the court-fixed period. Whether relief is granted depends on the court's discretion and the applicable procedural rules.

Section 151 CPC: saves the court's inherent power to make orders necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of its process. Section 149 CPC: concerns the court's power to permit payment of deficient court-fees and operates in its own field. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC: deals with the time for a written statement; the treatment of timelines depends on the applicable procedural regime, including special rules for commercial disputes. Limitation Act, 1963: governs statutory limitation periods in its own terms.

Read the related articles on Section 149 CPC (deficient court-fees), Section 148A CPC (caveat), Section 147 CPC, and the CPC sections and orders index.

Official legislative text is available through India Code. Judicial decisions may be researched through the Supreme Court of India and its official judgments resources. Check the latest binding decisions, local court rules and any special statutory regime before relying on an extension.

Frequently asked questions

What is Section 148 CPC?

Section 148 CPC permits a court, in its discretion, to enlarge a period it fixed or granted for an act prescribed or allowed by the Code.

What is the time limit under Section 148 CPC?

The text of Section 148 states that enlargement shall not exceed thirty days in total. Exceptional recourse to inherent powers is governed by judicial decisions and is not automatic.

Can the court extend time after the original deadline expires?

Yes. Section 148 expressly allows enlargement even after the originally fixed or granted period has expired.

Does Section 148 extend the limitation period for filing an appeal?

No. Section 148 concerns time fixed or granted by the court for procedural acts under the CPC. Statutory limitation periods require analysis under the applicable limitation law and other specific provisions.

Can a court grant an extension exceeding 30 days?

The Supreme Court has recognized that in appropriate exceptional circumstances inherent powers under Section 151 may remain available, notwithstanding the 30-day wording of Section 148. This is not a routine entitlement.

Is an extension automatic?

No. The power is discretionary. The applicant should explain the delay, act promptly and comply with any court directions or conditions.

This article is general legal information, not case-specific advice. The applicable court order, CPC amendments and binding decisions control the outcome of any application.