Home / Code of Civil Procedure / Order XLIX Rule 1
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 | Order 49

Order XLIX Rule 1 CPC - Who May Serve Processes of the High Court

Order XLIX Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) identifies who may serve specified judicial processes issued by a High Court in the exercise of its original civil and certain other jurisdictions. The rule also expressly excludes particular categories of process.

Text of Order XLIX Rule 1 CPC

1. Who may serve processes of High Court. - Notice to produce documents, summonses to witnesses, and every other judicial process, issued in the exercise of the original civil jurisdiction of the High Court, and of its matrimonial, testamentary and intestate jurisdictions, except summonses to defendants, writs of execution and notices to respondents may be served by the attorneys in the suits, or by persons employed by them, or by such other persons as the High Court, by any rule or order, directs.

Source: India Code - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (official PDF). The application of the rule may be affected by applicable High Court amendments and procedural rules.

Meaning and scope of the provision

The rule concerns service of judicial process, meaning the formal delivery or communication of court-issued documents in the manner permitted by law. It is situated in Order XLIX, titled Chartered High Courts, and should be read alongside the procedural rules of the High Court concerned.

Processes covered

  • Notices to produce documents: directions requiring production of documents relevant to court proceedings.
  • Summonses to witnesses: judicial directions requiring witnesses to attend or otherwise comply as directed.
  • Other judicial processes: processes falling within the rule's specified jurisdictions, subject to its express exclusions.

Persons who may serve these processes

Subject to the relevant High Court's rules and orders, the provision permits service by attorneys in the suits, persons employed by them, or other persons whom the High Court authorises through a rule or order. The statutory expression attorneys should be understood in its historical and procedural context; it does not confer an unrestricted right on any person to serve every category of process.

Processes expressly excluded

Order XLIX Rule 1 does not extend this permission to summonses to defendants, writs of execution or notices to respondents. Service of these documents must comply with the separately applicable CPC provisions, High Court rules and court directions.

Related CPC provisions

  • Order V: governs issue and service of summons on defendants in civil suits.
  • Order XVI: addresses summoning and attendance of witnesses.
  • Order XXI: deals with execution of decrees and orders.
  • Order XLVIII Rules 1 and 2: deal with expenses of process and the manner of serving orders and notices.
  • Order XLIX Rules 2 and 3: concern savings for Chartered High Courts and application of specified procedural rules.

Practical significance

Before arranging service, a litigant or legal practitioner should identify the type of process, the jurisdiction in which it was issued, and the current rules or specific directions of the High Court. The fact that a document is issued by a High Court does not by itself mean that Order XLIX Rule 1 authorises its service by an attorney or an employee.

For example, a witness summons issued in qualifying original-side proceedings may fall within the rule, whereas a summons to a defendant is expressly outside this particular permission. The actual method of service and proof of service remain subject to applicable procedural requirements.

Official legal reference

Read the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on India Code for the statutory wording. Also consult the current original-side rules and any amendments or practice directions of the relevant High Court before relying on a particular mode of service.

This article provides general legal information and is not a substitute for the applicable court rules or case-specific legal advice.