LawDadi - Indian law and legal updates
Home / Code of Civil Procedure / Order XXXIV Rule 6

Order XXXIV Rule 6 CPC - Recovery of Balance Due After Mortgage Sale

Order XXXIV Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) governs recovery of a shortfall after the court-ordered sale of mortgaged property. It does not automatically make the borrower personally liable: the remaining amount must be legally recoverable from the defendant independently of the property sold.

Text of Order XXXIV Rule 6 CPC

Where the net proceeds of any sale held under rule 5 are found insufficient to pay the amount due to the plaintiff, the Court, on application by him, may, if the balance is legally recoverable from the defendant otherwise than out of the property sold, pass a decree for such balance.

Meaning and legal effect

A mortgage is a transfer of an interest in specific immovable property to secure payment of a debt or performance of an obligation, as described in section 58 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The mortgagee is the lender or person receiving the security; the mortgagor is the person giving it.

A mortgage suit for sale is a proceeding in which the mortgagee seeks sale of the secured property to satisfy the mortgage debt. Order XXXIV Rule 4 concerns the preliminary decree; Rule 5 concerns the final decree and sale; Rule 6 addresses a shortfall after that sale.

Conditions for a decree for the balance

  1. Sale under Rule 5: The mortgaged property has been sold pursuant to the relevant final decree.
  2. Insufficient net proceeds: After applicable sale expenses, the net sale proceeds do not discharge the amount due to the plaintiff.
  3. Application by the plaintiff: The mortgagee applies to the court for a decree for the unpaid balance.
  4. Independent legal liability: The balance must be recoverable from the defendant personally or otherwise than from the property sold. This depends on the mortgage transaction and applicable law.
  5. Judicial determination: The court considers the shortfall and legal recoverability before granting a balance decree.

When is the defendant personally liable?

Section 68 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 specifies circumstances in which a mortgagee may sue for the mortgage money, subject to the statutory qualifications. The court must examine the deed, the nature of the mortgage, any personal covenant to pay, and applicable legal restrictions. A deficiency following sale alone is not enough to create a personal obligation.

Illustrative example

Suppose the amount lawfully due under the mortgage decree is Rs. 15 lakh and the net proceeds of the mortgage sale are Rs. 11 lakh. The shortfall is Rs. 4 lakh. The mortgagee may seek a decree under Rule 6 for that balance, but the court may grant it only if the defendant is legally liable for the remaining amount otherwise than from the property sold.

Order XXXIV Rule 4: preliminary decree in a mortgage suit for sale, including payment terms and the consequence of default. Order XXXIV Rule 5: final decree for sale and provisions concerning payment and redemption before confirmation of sale. Order XXXIV Rule 6: decree for a legally recoverable shortfall after the sale.

Official legislative references

Consult the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (First Schedule, Order XXXIV) and the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (particularly sections 58 and 68) on the official India Code portal. Check the applicable state amendments and current statutory text before relying on any provision in litigation.

This article provides general legal information. The availability of a balance decree depends on the pleadings, mortgage instrument, court findings and applicable law.