Home / Code of Civil Procedure / Order XXXV / Rule 6
Order XXXV Rule 6 CPC - Charge for Plaintiff's Costs in Interpleader Suits
Order XXXV Rule 6 explains how a court may protect the original plaintiff's costs when an interpleader suit has been properly instituted. It permits the court to create a charge on the disputed subject matter or use another effective method to secure those costs.
Text of Order XXXV Rule 6 CPC
Where the suit is properly instituted the Court may provide for the costs of the original plaintiff by giving him a charge on the thing claimed or in some other effectual way.
Meaning and legal effect
An interpleader suit is a proceeding in which a person holding money or property faces competing claims and seeks a judicial determination of who is entitled to it, without claiming a beneficial interest in the subject matter beyond permissible charges or costs. The governing provision is Section 88 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Order XXXV.
Rule 6 is discretionary. The words “may provide” allow the court, where the suit is properly instituted, to make an appropriate order for the original plaintiff's costs. They do not automatically entitle every plaintiff to a charge or to recovery of all claimed expenses.
What does a charge on the thing claimed mean?
A charge in this context is a court-directed security for the plaintiff's allowed costs against the property or fund claimed by rival defendants. The court may instead adopt another effective method suitable to the circumstances. The actual order, nature of the property, and applicable law determine how the protection operates.
When can the court grant protection for costs?
The court first considers whether the interpleader suit has been properly instituted. Relevant requirements include the absence of a beneficial claim by the stakeholder (apart from charges or costs), the existence of competing claims, and compliance with the pleading and procedural requirements under Order XXXV. The court then decides whether, and how, the plaintiff's costs should be secured.
Related CPC provisions
- Section 88 CPC: enables a qualifying stakeholder, facing adverse claims to the same debt, money or property, to bring an interpleader suit for determination of the rightful claimant, subject to the statutory conditions.
- Order XXXV Rule 1: requires the plaint to disclose the plaintiff's limited interest, the respective defendants' claims and absence of collusion.
- Order XXXV Rule 2: concerns payment or placement of the disputed thing into court when the court so directs.
- Order XXXV Rule 4: permits the court at the first hearing to discharge the plaintiff, award costs and dismiss the plaintiff from the suit, or retain parties as necessary.
- Section 35 CPC: supplies the general framework for costs of civil proceedings, subject to the court's discretion and applicable rules.
Practical illustration
A warehouse operator holds goods claimed by two different persons and brings a properly maintainable interpleader suit without asserting ownership. If the court considers it appropriate, it may protect the operator's allowable litigation costs by directing that they be secured against the goods or by another effective arrangement. The court must still decide entitlement and the proper costs order on the facts.
Important: Rule 6 concerns the original plaintiff's costs, not the merits of the competing defendants' ownership claims. A charge is not automatic merely because an interpleader plaint has been filed.
Official statutory source
For the authoritative enactment and updates, consult the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on India Code. Check applicable state amendments, court rules and subsequent legislative changes when relying on this provision in a particular proceeding.