Home / Income-tax Act, 1961 / Section 269H
Income-tax Act, 1961 | Chapter XX-A | Historical provision

Section 269H: Appeal to High Court against property acquisition orders

Section 269H set out the High Court appeal procedure against an order of the Appellate Tribunal under Section 269G in the former immovable-property acquisition framework of Chapter XX-A.

Legal status and applicability

Under Section 269RR, Chapter XX-A does not apply to transfers of immovable property made after 30 September 1986. Accordingly, the appeal mechanism below is principally relevant to historical cases and interpretation of the former law; it is not a general present-day High Court appeal route for property transactions.

The Income-tax Act, 2025 commenced on 1 April 2026. Historical provisions and transitional or saved proceedings should be considered with the relevant legislation and facts.

Meaning and scope of Section 269H

Chapter XX-A dealt with acquisition of certain immovable properties in specified circumstances. Section 269F governed the competent authority's decision after objections; Section 269G provided an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal; and Section 269H provided a further appeal to the High Court on a question of law.

A question of law concerns interpretation or application of legal rules, as distinguished from merely asking the High Court to reassess factual findings. The High Court's jurisdiction under this section was therefore narrower than a general rehearing on the merits.

Section 269H: statutory provisions

The following retains the substance and subsections of the text supplied in the original webpage, with footnote markers removed for readability.

Subsection (1): Right to appeal and limitation

The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, or any person aggrieved by an order of the Appellate Tribunal under Section 269G, may appeal to the High Court on any question of law within 60 days of service of notice of that order.

Proviso: The High Court may, on an application made before expiry of the 60-day period, permit the appeal to be presented within a further period specified by its order if sufficient cause for the delay is established.

Subsection (2): Composition of the Bench

An appeal under subsection (1) shall be heard by a Bench of not fewer than two Judges of the High Court. The provisions of Section 259 apply to such appeals as they apply to a case referred to the High Court under Section 256.

Subsection (3): Costs

The costs of the appeal shall be in the discretion of the High Court.

Historical amendment note

The reference to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner reflects the substitution made by Section 4 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014 (Act 25 of 2014), with retrospective effect from 1 June 2013. The original page recorded this amendment and it is retained here.

How an appeal under Section 269H worked

  1. Tribunal order: The Appellate Tribunal decided an acquisition appeal under Section 269G.
  2. Eligible appellant: The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, or another person aggrieved by the Tribunal's order, could appeal.
  3. Grounds: The appeal had to raise a question of law.
  4. Filing period: The statutory period was 60 days from service of notice of the Tribunal's order, subject to the provision's specific extension mechanism.
  5. Hearing: A Bench of at least two High Court judges heard the matter, with Section 259 applicable as specified.
  6. Costs: The High Court determined costs at its discretion.

For the associated notice, objection and acquisition stages, see Section 269D, Section 269E and Section 269F.

Frequently asked questions

What was the time limit for a High Court appeal under Section 269H?

The historical provision specified 60 days from service of notice of the Tribunal's order. Its proviso allowed a further period only on an application made before the original 60-day period expired and upon sufficient cause.

Could a High Court reconsider all factual findings under Section 269H?

The statutory appeal was limited to a question of law; it was not expressed as a general second appeal on all facts.

Does Section 269H govern present-day property acquisitions?

No. Section 269RR made Chapter XX-A inapplicable to immovable-property transfers after 30 September 1986. Present-day disputes must be evaluated under the law governing the particular transaction or proceeding.

How many judges were required to hear the appeal?

Section 269H(2) specified a Bench of at least two High Court judges.

Official legal references

This article provides general legal information about a historical provision. For an actual pending or legacy dispute, consult the relevant statutory text, saving provisions, judicial decisions and applicable procedural rules.