Home / Code of Civil Procedure / Order V Rule 19

Order V Rule 19 CPC - Examination of Serving Officer

Order 5 Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 explains how a civil court verifies a summons returned under Rule 17, including when examination of the serving officer is mandatory and when it is discretionary.

Order V Rule 19 CPC - Statutory provision

19. Examination of serving officer

Where a summons is returned under rule 17, the Court shall, if the return under that rule has not been verified by the affidavit of the serving officer, and may, if it has been so verified, examine the serving officer on oath, or cause him to be so examined by another Court, touching his proceedings, and may make such further enquiry in the matter as it thinks fit; and shall either declare that the summons has been duly served or order such service as it thinks fit.

Source: Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - official India Code PDF. Local High Court rules and applicable amendments should also be checked.

Meaning and scope of Rule 19

Rule 19 operates when a serving officer returns a summons after taking the steps described in Order V Rule 17. This may involve refusal to sign an acknowledgment or an unsuccessful attempt to find the defendant, followed by affixation of a copy of the summons in the circumstances permitted by that rule.

The purpose of Rule 19 is judicial scrutiny of the service report before the court treats the summons as duly served. A return by the serving officer is not, merely because it is filed, a substitute for the court's decision under Rule 19.

Examination of the serving officer: requirements and procedure

1. Return without an affidavit

Where the Rule 17 return is not verified by the serving officer's affidavit, the court shall examine the serving officer on oath or arrange for examination by another court. The word "shall" makes this examination obligatory under the central text of the rule.

2. Return verified by affidavit

Where the return has been verified by affidavit, the court may examine the officer on oath. This is a discretionary power; verification by affidavit does not prevent further judicial enquiry.

3. Further enquiry

The court may investigate the steps taken to locate the defendant, the reason for refusal or non-service, the circumstances of affixation, and the identification of the premises or witnesses, as relevant to the return.

4. Decision on service

After considering the return, any examination and any further enquiry, the court must either declare the summons duly served or order such service as it thinks fit. The court's decision should reflect the facts and the applicable procedural rules.

Important distinction: Rule 17 describes the serving officer's steps in specified circumstances; Rule 19 provides for the court's examination of the resulting return. Rule 20 separately governs substituted service ordered by the court.

Practical significance of a service return

A service report should allow the court to evaluate whether the statutory procedure was followed. Where Rule 17 affixation is involved, the report should state the circumstances and the name and address of any person who identified the house or witnessed the affixation. The court may scrutinize these particulars under Rule 19.

Proper service is important because it gives the defendant notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to appear. Where a defendant does not appear, the court must consider whether summons was duly served before proceeding under the applicable provisions of Order IX.

Frequently asked questions

Is examination of the serving officer compulsory under Order V Rule 19?

Yes, where the summons is returned under Rule 17 without verification by the serving officer's affidavit, the court must examine the officer on oath or have another court do so. If the return is affidavit-verified, examination is discretionary.

Can the court order fresh service after a Rule 17 return?

Yes. After examining the return and making any appropriate enquiry, the court must either declare due service or direct service as it thinks fit.

Does affixing summons automatically prove service?

No. Affixation under Rule 17 is subject to scrutiny under Rule 19. The court must decide whether service was duly effected.

Is Rule 19 the same as substituted service under Rule 20?

No. Rule 19 concerns judicial scrutiny of a Rule 17 return. Rule 20 concerns substituted service ordered by the court when its statutory conditions are met.

This article explains the central CPC provision for general information. State amendments, High Court rules and case-specific court directions may affect the applicable procedure.