LawDadi legal information and updates
Home / Code of Civil Procedure / Order XXI Rule 50

Order XXI Rule 50 CPC - Execution of Decree Against a Firm

Order XXI Rule 50 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) governs how a decree against a partnership firm may be executed against partnership property and, subject to specified safeguards, individual partners.

Key distinction: A decree against a firm can be executed against partnership property. Execution against a person's individual property depends on that person's status, service of summons, and the procedure prescribed by Rule 50.

Meaning and scope of Order 21 Rule 50 CPC

In civil execution proceedings, a decree-holder is the person entitled to enforce the decree, while a judgment-debtor is the person against whom it can be enforced. A partnership firm may be sued in its firm name under Order XXX CPC, but a decree against the firm does not automatically expose every alleged partner's personal assets to execution.

Order XXI Rule 50 - Legal provisions explained

Sub-rule (1): Persons and property against which execution may proceed

Where a decree has been passed against a firm, execution may be granted:

  1. Against any property of the partnership.
  2. Against a person who appeared in his or her own name under Order XXX Rule 6 or Rule 7, admitted partnership in the pleadings, or was adjudged to be a partner.
  3. Against a person individually served with summons as a partner who failed to appear.

Proviso: These provisions do not limit or otherwise affect Section 30 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, which deals with minors admitted to the benefits of partnership.

Sub-rule (2): Court's leave for execution against another alleged partner

Where the decree-holder seeks execution against a person not covered by clauses (b) or (c) of sub-rule (1), on the ground that the person was a partner, an application for leave must be made to the court that passed the decree. If liability is not disputed, the court may grant leave. If disputed, the court may direct that liability be tried and determined as an issue in a suit.

Sub-rule (3): Effect of determination

The order determining liability under sub-rule (2) has the same force and is subject to the same conditions regarding appeal or otherwise as if it were a decree.

Sub-rule (4): Protection where summons was not served

Except as against partnership property, a decree against a firm does not release, render liable or otherwise affect a partner unless the partner was served with summons to appear and answer. This protection must be read with the procedure for determining liability under sub-rule (2).

Sub-rule (5): Hindu Undivided Family exception

Rule 50 does not apply to a decree passed against a Hindu Undivided Family by virtue of Order XXX Rule 10 CPC.

Procedure for execution against a firm

  1. Obtain an executable decree against the partnership firm and apply for execution under Order XXI CPC.
  2. Identify partnership property or the persons falling within Rule 50(1)(b) or (c).
  3. Where execution is sought against another alleged partner, apply to the court that passed the decree for leave under Rule 50(2).
  4. If partnership liability is disputed, seek its judicial determination before proceeding against that person's individual assets.
  5. Comply with the applicable attachment, sale and exemption provisions of the CPC.

Order XXX Rules 1, 3, 6 and 7 CPC concern suits in the name of firms, service of summons, appearance of partners and appearance under protest. Order XXX Rule 10 concerns persons carrying on business in names other than their own. Order XXI Rule 49 CPC addresses attachment of partnership property for decrees against individual partners. Section 60 CPC identifies property liable to attachment and sale, subject to exemptions.

Section 25 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 provides for partners' joint and several liability for acts of the firm done while they are partners, subject to the applicable law and procedural safeguards. Section 30 deals with a minor admitted to the benefits of partnership.

Practical example

Suppose a supplier obtains a money decree against ABC Traders, a partnership firm. The supplier may seek execution against the firm's assets. If a partner appeared in the suit in the manner specified by Rule 50(1), execution may also be available against that person. If the supplier seeks to proceed against another person whose partnership status is disputed, the supplier must seek leave and have liability determined under Rule 50(2).

Frequently asked questions

Can a firm's decree be executed against a partner's personal property?

Yes, where the requirements of Order XXI Rule 50 are met. The mere fact that a decree names the firm does not remove the procedural protections applicable to an alleged partner.

What happens if someone denies being a partner?

For a person falling outside Rule 50(1)(b) and (c), the decree-holder must apply for leave under Rule 50(2). If liability is disputed, the court may determine the issue through a trial-like process.

Can partnership property be attached for one partner's personal debt?

Order XXI Rule 49 generally protects partnership property from direct attachment for a personal decree against one partner, while permitting a charging order against that partner's interest subject to its conditions.

Official legal resources

Consult the India Code official legislation portal for the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, including amendments. The Gazette of India publishes official notifications. Check applicable High Court amendments to the CPC and binding judicial decisions for the jurisdiction concerned.

More CPC provisions

Legal information only. The applicable law and court procedure should be checked for the relevant jurisdiction and facts.