Home / Code of Civil Procedure / Order XXXIV Rule 14

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 | Order XXXIV

Order XXXIV Rule 14 CPC - Separate Suit Required for Sale of Mortgaged Property

Order 34 Rule 14 explains why a mortgagee who has obtained a money decree on a claim arising under a mortgage must ordinarily file a separate mortgage enforcement suit before seeking sale of the mortgaged property.

Statutory provision: Order XXXIV Rule 14

Rule 14(1) - Suit for sale necessary for bringing mortgaged property to sale. Where a mortgagee has obtained a decree for the payment of money in satisfaction of a claim arising under the mortgage, he shall not be entitled to bring the mortgaged property to sale otherwise than by instituting a suit for sale in enforcement of the mortgage, and he may institute such suit notwithstanding anything contained in Order II, rule 2.

Rule 14(2). Nothing in sub-rule (1) shall apply to any territories to which the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882), has not been extended.

Official text: Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (India Code PDF).

Meaning and purpose of Rule 14

A mortgagee is the person in whose favour an interest in specific immovable property is transferred as security for a debt or obligation; a mortgagor is the person who creates that security. These expressions are defined in Section 58 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

A money decree directs payment of money. A mortgage sale decree is obtained through proceedings enforcing the mortgage security. Rule 14 distinguishes the two: a decree for payment of mortgage-related money does not, merely by itself, permit the decree-holder to sell the mortgaged property as mortgage security. The mortgagee must institute a suit for sale under the mortgage, subject to the rule's territorial exception and other applicable law.

How a mortgagee enforces the security

Establish the mortgage and debt: identify the mortgage deed or other security, the amount due and the basis of the claim.
File a suit for sale: seek relief enforcing the mortgage where Rule 14 applies, even if a money decree has already been obtained on the mortgage claim.
Follow Order XXXIV: Rule 4 governs the preliminary decree in a suit for sale, and Rule 5 governs the final decree and sale process, subject to the facts and applicable law.
Respect redemption and other rights: the mortgagor and other interested parties retain the protections afforded by the governing mortgage law and court orders.

Order II Rule 2 CPC - Whole claim in a suit

Ordinarily, Order II Rule 2 requires a plaintiff to include the whole claim arising from the same cause of action, subject to its terms. Order XXXIV Rule 14 expressly permits the later mortgage sale suit notwithstanding Order II Rule 2. This is a specific statutory exception, not a general exemption for unrelated claims.

Section 67, Transfer of Property Act - Foreclosure or sale

Section 67 deals with the mortgagee's right, in appropriate cases and subject to statutory restrictions, to obtain a decree for foreclosure or sale after the mortgage money becomes due. The remedy depends on the kind of mortgage and other applicable conditions.

Section 68, Transfer of Property Act - Suit for mortgage money

Section 68 identifies circumstances in which a mortgagee may sue for mortgage money. A personal money claim and enforcement of mortgage security are legally distinct remedies; the availability of one does not automatically eliminate the procedure required for the other.

Order XXXIV Rules 4 and 5 CPC - Mortgage sale decrees

Rule 4 addresses the preliminary decree in a mortgage sale suit, including ascertainment of the amount due and the time allowed for payment. Rule 5 concerns the final decree and sale where the required payment is not made, subject to the rule's conditions.

Illustrative example

A lender takes a mortgage over a property and later obtains a decree requiring the borrower to pay the outstanding mortgage debt. If the lender seeks to realise the mortgage security through sale of that property, Rule 14 ordinarily requires a mortgage sale suit rather than treating the earlier money decree as a mortgage sale decree. Whether any other execution remedy is available must be considered separately on the facts and governing law.

Judicial interpretation

In S. Nazeer Ahmed v. State Bank of Mysore (2007), the Supreme Court discussed the exception to Order II Rule 2 and explained the requirement of a suit for sale to enforce the mortgage under Rule 14. See the judgment text.

Territorial exception under Rule 14(2)

Sub-rule (2) excludes territories to which the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 has not been extended. The relevant territorial application and any local amendments should be checked before relying on the rule in a particular case.

Official legal references

Legal note: This is a general explanation of the central provisions. Court procedure, state amendments, special recovery statutes and the terms of a particular decree may affect the available remedy.