Format of Rejoinder to be filed in the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) against the Counter Affidavit filed by the Respondents)
IN THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH : NEW DELHI
O.A. NO.______OF 20________
IN THE MATTER OF :
_____________________
Applicant
Versus
_____________________
Respondents
REJOINDER TO THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NO. ________
AND ________
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH
1. With respect to para No. ________ of the counter, it is submitted that the
contents thereof are matter of record.
2. With respect to para No. ________of the counter, it is submitted that the
contents thereof are matter of record. It is further submitted that the rest of
the context in para under reply are misconceived.
3-4 With respect to para No. ________ and ________ of the counter, it is
submitted that the contents thereof are matter of record. It is further
submitted that on the said official website of Respondent No. ________, two
lists were loaded in relation to the above said examination. One list of the
successful candidates who had passed the examination and second list was of the
candidates whose candidature was rejected for various reasons.
It is further submitted that the Respondents herein issued a list bearing No.
________/________ containing the name of the candidates who have been
provisionally selected and recommended for the post of Assistant Teacher
(Primary) with government of Delhi and MCD. It is further submitted that in the
said that it has also been mentioned that the said result has been declared as
per outcome of the court cases. However the Respondents herein did not provide
any details of the cases. Therefore this fact also shows illegality on the part
of Respondent.
5. With respect to para No.5 of the counter affidavit, it is submitted that the
contents thereof are misconceived. It is submitted that the Respondents herein
issued office order No. ________ and published a rejection notice for the post
of Teacher (Primary). The name of the Petitioner herein figures at serial No.
________ and it has been stated that she becomes overage on this very ground,
she was declared to be unsuccessful candidate.
6. With respect to para No. ________ of the counter affidavit, it is submitted
that the contents thereof are misconceived. It is submitted that the Petitioner
herein entitled to get selected for the post of teacher (Primary) in view of the
judgment and order dated ________in ________and Others Vs. Delhi Subordinate
Service Selection Board. Therefore the rest of the contents in para under reply
has no substance and hence are denied.
7. With respect to para No. ________ of the counter affidavit, it is submitted
that the contents thereof are vehemently denied. It is also denied that the
Petitioner/ Applicant is not having ___ Course. However, the Applicant herein
has compl___________d her D. Ed. Diploma in Education in the year ___________
and same is equivalent to ________. Therefore the facts of the present case are
squarely covered under the case of ___________& Ors. Vs. ___________ W.P. (C)
No___________of ___. It is further submitted that para No.59 of the said
judgment is also applicable to the Applicant herein and her legal right cannot
be taken away by the Respondents as she is entitled for candidature as mentioned
above.
8. With respect to para No.8 of the counter affidavit, it is submitted that the
contents thereof are misconceived and hence are denied. It is also denied that
the Applicant herein is not having requisite qualification of ___________,
though the fact remains that D. Ed. Course is equivalent to the ___________
course and Applicant herein was working last 3 years as an adhoc teacher in
Delhi. Therefore she is entitled to get selected for the post of teacher
(Primary).
REJOINDER TO PARAWISE REPLY
1. With respect to para No.1 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that the
contents thereof are wrong and hence are denied. It is also denied that the
Petitioner/ Applicant is not having ___________ course as per the directions
given in the judgment. It may be relevant to point out that in the present
matter, it is more than clear that the Applicant herein has compl___________d
the JBT/ ___________ couse in the year 2006 and as such she is entitled to get
the relaxation as given in Sachin Gupta case and an advertisement came to be
issued by the Respondents in pursuance of the Sachin Gupta case relating to the
appointment of primary teacher in the month of December, 2009.
2-3 With respect to para No.2 and 3 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that
the contents thereof do not require any rejoinder.
4.1 With respect to para No.4 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that the
contents thereof are vehemently denied. It is also denied that candidature of
the Applicant herein cannot be rejected on the ground of disqualification as she
is having requisite qualification as per Sachin Gupta’s case. Accordingly the
case of the Sachin Gupta’s is squarely applicable to the facts of the present
case. It is also submitted with great respect that D. Ed. Course is equivalent
to the ___________ course.
4.2-4.3 With respect to para No.4.2 – 4.3 of the parawise reply, it is submitted
that the contents thereof do not require any rejoinder.
4.4 With respect to para No.4.4 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that the
contents thereof are wrong and denied. It is also denied that Petitioner has not
mentioned anywhere that she is having equivalent qualification. It is submitted
that para No.1 of list of dates at page A mentioned that Applicant has diploma.
It is further submitted that the Petitioner herein has urged before this
Tribunal that the Petitioner herein has been working in the State of Haryana as
an Assistant Teacher in the category of JBT and as such she is entitled to get
age relaxation of age throughout.
4.5 With respect to para No.4.5 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that the
contents thereof do not require any rejoinder.
4.6 With respect to para No.4.6 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that the
contents thereof are wrong. It is also wrong that Applicant was not having
eligibility. The Applicant herein is eligible for candidature as per the
documents which she has diploma in D. Ed. Course which is equivalent to JBT/
___________. Therefore her candidature cannot be rejected on the one or other
grounds.
4.7 With respect to para No.4.7 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that the
contents thereof do not require any rejoinder.
4.8 With respect to para No.4.8 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that the
contents thereof are vehemently denied. It is also wrong that in the facts of
the present case the judgment of Sachin Gupta is applicable. The Respondents are
not permitted to reject the candidature of the Petitioner.
4.9 With respect to para No.4.9 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that the
contents thereof are wrong and hence denied. It is also denied that Sachin Gupta
case has not been misrepresented by the Applicant herein, the said case is
applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case as ___________ is
equivalent to JBT and D. Ed. Course.
It may be relevant to mention here that in para No.4 the Respondent herein has
mentioned that Petitioner “nowhere mentioned that candidates having equivalent
qualification will also be benefited”. However in para under reply he states
that ‘no equivalent qualification will also be benefited”. Therefore there has
been a contradiction in para No.4.4 and 4.9 of the reply.
4.10 With respect to para No.4.10 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that
the contents thereof are wrong and hence are denied. It is also denied that
working as teacher cannot be claimed as right of employment as a teacher
everywhere. However the contents of corresponding para under reply is
reiterated.
4.11 With respect to para No.4.11 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that
the contents thereof do not require any rejoinder.
4.12 With respect to para No.4.12 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that
the contents thereof are wrong and misconceived. It is also wrong that the
Applicant is claiming for the candidature on the basis of experience as
Assistant Teacher in Haryana though she has requisite qualification as
prescribed in advertisement issued in pursuance to the direction of Sachin Gupta
case.
4.13 With respect to para No.4.13 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that
the contents thereof do not require any rejoinder.
4.14 With respect to para No.4.14 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that
the contents thereof are wrong. It is wrong to say that judgment of Sachin Gupta
has misrepresented. The fact remains that the said judgment is applicable to the
facts of the present case. Therefore the submission made in para under reply are
misconceived and hence are denied.
4.15 With respect to para No.4.15 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that
the contents thereof are denied. It is also wrong that the Applicant has
misinterpreted the judgment. It is submitted with great respect that the
Applicant herein is eligible for candidature as per the Sachin Gupta case and as
such her claim cannot said to be rejected on the basis of false submission.
4.16 -4.20 With respect to para No.4.16- 4.20 of the parawise reply, it is
submitted that the contents thereof do not require any rejoinder.
4.21 With respect to para No.4.21 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that
the contents thereof are wrong and denied. It is also wrong that Applicant is
not falling under the conditions as put by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in
Sachin Gupta case of the Petitioner/ Applicant is squarely covered under the
said judgment. The rest of the contents of para under reply are matter of
record.
4.22 With respect to para No.4.22 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that
the contents thereof do not require any rejoinder.
4.23 With respect to para No.4.23 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that
the contents thereof denied. It is denied that there has been any
misinterpretation of the judgment as mentioned above. The Applicant is having
equivalent diploma in D. Ed. Course and having rich experience in teaching.
4.24 With respect to para No.4.24 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that
the contents thereof are wrong. It is submitted that the Applicant is also
entitled to get benefit of Sachin Gupta case with regard to age relaxation.
Therefore she cannot be treated as overage.
4.25 With respect to para No.4.25 of the parawise reply, it is submitted that
the contents thereof are wrong. The Petitioner herein does not misrepresent the
judgment titled as Sachin Gupta vs.
THROUGH;
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER
Dated: __.__.________
138 Negotiable Instruments Act Complaint Format to file case against return of cheque
Application for Clarification Format Supreme Court
Application for Direction - Supreme Court
Application for early haring in format for High Court
Application for Substitution Supreme Court
Application for vacation of stay format for High Court
Civil Appeal Format Supreme Court
Contempt of Court Petition Format Supreme Court
Counter Affidavit Format - High Court
Legal Notice format demanding dues from the employer
Rejoinder Format for Central Administrative Tribunal
Review Petition Format Supreme Court
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Format Supreme Court
Transfer Petition (Criminal) format Supreme Court
Written Argument format, 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Complaint, return of cheque
Writ Petition PIL Format High Court
Writ Petition format for High Court
Writ Petition format challenging CAT Judgment in High Court