Home / Police Act, 1861 / Section 34
Police Act, 1861 | Section 34

Section 34 Police Act, 1861: Punishment for Certain Offences on Roads and Public Streets

Section 34 identifies specified acts causing obstruction, inconvenience, annoyance, risk, danger or damage in covered public places. It also provides a limited power of arrest without warrant when an officer witnesses an offence under the provision.

Applicability matters: The statutory wording refers to towns to which Section 34 has been specially extended by the State Government. Local police laws, amendments, notifications and other applicable legislation must be checked before treating this historical central text as the operative rule in a particular area.

Text of Section 34 of the Police Act, 1861

Punishment for certain offences on roads, etc. Any person who, on any road or in any open place or street or thoroughfare within the limits of any town to which this section shall be specially extended by the State Government, commits any of the following offences, to the obstruction, inconvenience, annoyance, risk, danger or damage of the residents or passengers shall, on conviction before a Magistrate, be liable to a fine not exceeding fifty rupees, or to imprisonment with or without hard labour not exceeding eight days;

Power of police-officers. And it shall be lawful for any police-officer to take into custody, without a warrant, any person who within his view commits any of such offences, namely:

First. Slaughtering cattle, furious riding, etc. Any person who slaughters any cattle or cleans any carcass; any person who rides or drives any cattle recklessly or furiously, or trains or breaks any horse or other cattle;

Second. Cruelty to animals. Any person who wantonly or cruelly beats, abuses or tortures any animal;

Third. Obstructing passengers. Any person who keeps any cattle or conveyance of any kind standing longer than is required for loading or unloading or for taking up or setting down passengers, or who leaves any conveyance in such a manner as to cause inconvenience or danger to the public;

Fourth. Exposing goods for sale. Any person who exposes any goods for sale;

Fifth. Throwing dirt into street. Any person who throws or lays down any dirt, filth, rubbish or any stones or building materials, or who constructs any cowshed, stable or the like, or who causes any offensive matter to run from any house, factory, dungheap, or the like;

Sixth. Being found drunk or riotous. Any person who is found drunk or riotous or who is incapable of taking care of himself;

Seventh. Indecent exposure of person. Any person who wilfully and indecently exposes his person, or any offensive deformity or disease, or commits nuisance by easing himself, or by bathing or washing in any tank or reservoir not being a place set apart for that purpose;

Eighth. Neglect to protect dangerous places. Any person who neglects to fence in or duly to protect any well, tank or other dangerous place or structure.

Reading note: The text above presents the eight categories in readable form and retains historical wording. Its interpretation is subject to constitutional safeguards, later legislation, judicial decisions and applicable local amendments. The provision is not a blanket prohibition of every act mentioned irrespective of its statutory context.

Meaning and scope of Section 34

The introductory clause links the listed conduct to public obstruction, inconvenience, annoyance, risk, danger or damage. The specified public location and the territorial extension of the section are important threshold issues. An allegation should be assessed against the exact applicable text, rather than against a general description such as public nuisance.

What conduct is covered?

  • Animals and riding: slaughter or carcass cleaning, reckless driving of cattle, or training animals in the covered setting.
  • Animal cruelty: wanton or cruel beating, abuse or torture, subject also to current animal-welfare legislation.
  • Obstruction: leaving animals or vehicles in a way that causes public inconvenience or danger.
  • Street trading: exposing goods for sale where the provision applies; street-vending rights and local rules may also be relevant.
  • Waste and hazards: throwing rubbish, leaving building materials, discharging offensive matter, or failing to safeguard dangerous structures.
  • Disorderly or indecent conduct: the particular acts described in the sixth and seventh clauses, construed consistently with constitutional rights and applicable law.

Punishment and arrest under the historical text

IssueSection 34 provision
FineNot exceeding Rs. 50 under the unamended central text
ImprisonmentNot exceeding eight days, with or without hard labour, under the historical wording
ConvictionBefore a Magistrate
Arrest without warrantExpressly refers to a police officer witnessing a listed offence; modern procedural safeguards and local law remain relevant

Do not assume that the historical Rs. 50 ceiling or eight-day term governs every present-day prosecution. A state amendment, substituted police statute or another applicable enactment may prescribe a different rule. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), effective from 1 July 2024, contains current general criminal-procedure safeguards; it does not by itself establish that Section 34 applies in every state.

Uttar Pradesh state amendments and transitional provisions

The source page records a Uttar Pradesh provision headed Section 34-A: Compounding of offences under Sections 32 and 34. In substance, it permits the District Superintendent of Police, subject to State Government orders, to compound qualifying offences before or after institution of prosecution on payment of a composition fee not exceeding the applicable maximum fine. Compounding before prosecution prevents prosecution for the compounded offence and requires release from custody if detained for that offence; compounding after institution ordinarily has the effect specified by the governing state text.

Source reference: Uttar Pradesh Act 35 of 1979, as identified in the original page. The uploaded source repeats the phrase "before the institution of the prosecution" in both subclauses, apparently a transcription inconsistency. The precise wording and present operation of Section 34-A should be checked against the official Uttar Pradesh enactment before reliance.

Historical abatement provision mentioned in the source

The original article also reproduces a Uttar Pradesh provision dealing with abatement of certain old pending trials and preventive proceedings. It refers to offences under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Public Gambling Act, 1867 (with stated exceptions); Section 34 of the Police Act; Section 160 of the former Indian Penal Code; certain fine-only offences; and proceedings under Sections 107 and 109 of the former Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. It describes a historical cut-off of 31 December 2015 and cites Uttar Pradesh Acts 35 of 1979, 29 of 2016 and 9 of 2018.

This is a transitional historical measure, not a general rule that new cases under these laws automatically abate. Verify its official text, commencement, amendments and applicability to the particular pending proceeding.

Depending on the facts and jurisdiction, other legislation may govern traffic, animal welfare, public sanitation, street vending, public order and criminal procedure. The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, and the BNSS, 2023 may be relevant. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 replaced the Indian Penal Code for most new offences from 1 July 2024, subject to savings and transitional rules. These laws are not automatic substitutes for each clause of Section 34.

Legislative notes retained from the original page

  1. The words concerning an "open place or street or thoroughfare" were inserted by the amendment identified in the source as Section 13 of Act 8 of 1895.
  2. "State Government" was substituted by the Adaptation Order, 1950 for "Provincial Government", following the Adaptation Order, 1937.
  3. The reference to "residents or passengers" was substituted by Act 8 of 1895, Section 13, as noted in the source.
  4. The words "with or without hard labour" were inserted by Act 1 of 1903, Section 3 and the Second Schedule.

Frequently asked questions

Does Section 34 apply everywhere in India?

No universal applicability should be assumed. Check the relevant State Government extension notification, any state police act and amendments, and the local legal position.

Can a police officer arrest someone without a warrant under Section 34?

The historical provision authorises custody where a police officer personally sees a listed offence. Any actual arrest must also satisfy the applicable present-day legal and constitutional requirements.

Is every street vendor automatically guilty under Section 34?

No. The precise statutory conditions, applicable territorial law, street-vending legislation and local permissions must be considered.

Is the penalty still Rs. 50?

That is the penalty in the reproduced central historical text. Local amendments and other applicable statutes must be verified before stating the penalty in a particular jurisdiction.

Official legal sources

Legal information updated for November 2026. For a live dispute or prosecution, consult the operative state statute, notifications and current case law.