Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023: Oral, Documentary and Electronic Evidence
The law of evidence determines which facts may be proved in court, how witnesses and documents are examined, and who bears the burden of proof. In India, the principal current statute is the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), which came into force on 1 July 2024. The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 remains important for understanding earlier law and proceedings protected by transitional provisions.
What is evidence under Indian law?
Evidence includes statements, including those given electronically, that the court permits or requires witnesses to make in relation to matters of fact, and documents, including electronic or digital records, produced for the court's inspection. The BSA also distinguishes a fact in issue, which directly affects a claimed right, liability or disability, from a relevant fact, which the statute makes legally connected to an issue.
Section 2 of the BSA contains the key definitions, including evidence, document, fact, proved, disproved and not proved. A fact is proved when the court believes it exists or considers its existence so probable that a prudent person ought to act on that supposition.
Relevance of facts, admissions and confessions
BSA section 3 establishes the basic rule that evidence may be given of facts in issue and relevant facts, but not other facts. Section 4 concerns facts forming part of the same transaction. Rules on motive, preparation, conduct, admissions and confessions determine when surrounding facts or statements may be considered.
An admission is a statement suggesting an inference about a fact in issue or relevant fact, made by a person and in circumstances recognized by law. A confession is an admission of guilt in a criminal context and is subject to stricter safeguards. In particular, BSA section 23 generally bars proof of a confession made to a police officer against an accused, subject to the statutory discovery-related proviso and other qualifications.
Oral evidence and direct testimony
BSA section 54 allows facts other than the contents of documents to be proved by oral evidence. Section 55 generally requires oral evidence to be direct: a witness describing something seen, heard or otherwise perceived must speak from that perception. Exceptions and special rules, including those relating to statements by unavailable persons, must be considered separately.
Documentary evidence and electronic records
Primary evidence ordinarily means the document itself produced for inspection; secondary evidence includes legally recognized substitutes, admissible only as permitted by law. The BSA deals with primary evidence in section 57 and secondary evidence in section 58. Electronic or digital records cannot be denied admissibility merely because of their electronic form (section 61), while section 63 lays down conditions and certificate requirements for admitting computer output and other electronic records.
Examples include emails, electronic messages, CCTV footage, mobile-device data, server logs and digital contracts. Parties should preserve original devices, relevant metadata and records of collection or extraction. The precise proof and certification requirements depend on the nature of the record and the statutory conditions.
Facts that need not be proved
Judicial notice allows courts to recognize certain facts without formal proof; the BSA addresses this in sections 51 and 52. Section 53 addresses facts admitted by parties, which ordinarily need not be proved, though the court may require proof in an appropriate case. These rules do not mean that every uncontested assertion is automatically accepted.
Burden of proof and presumptions
Burden of proof is the legal responsibility to establish a fact or case. Under BSA section 104, a person seeking a judgment about a legal right or liability dependent on asserted facts must prove those facts. Section 105 addresses on whom the burden lies. Other provisions address facts especially within a person's knowledge, legal presumptions and particular categories of proceedings.
The standards of proof differ: criminal guilt generally requires proof beyond reasonable doubt, whereas civil disputes generally use the balance of probabilities, subject to the nature of the issue and applicable law.
Witnesses, examination and cross-examination
Witness rules address competency, protected communications, examination-in-chief, cross-examination, re-examination, leading questions, contradiction using earlier statements and the court's authority to assess admissibility. Examination-in-chief is questioning by the party calling the witness; cross-examination is questioning by the adverse party; and re-examination follows cross-examination to clarify matters raised. The BSA continues these core safeguards with reorganized section numbers.
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 versus Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
| Topic | Earlier law | Current BSA provision |
|---|---|---|
| Definitions | Section 3 | Section 2 |
| Facts in issue and relevant facts | Section 5 | Section 3 |
| Same transaction | Section 6 | Section 4 |
| Facts admitted need not be proved | Section 58 | Section 53 |
| Oral evidence and direct testimony | Sections 59-60 | Sections 54-55 |
| Primary and secondary evidence | Sections 62-63 | Sections 57-58 |
| Electronic-record admissibility | Section 65B | Section 63 |
| Burden of proof | Section 101 | Section 104 |
The correspondence above is a quick guide, not a complete equivalence table: the new Act also revises language and provisions, particularly for electronic records.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 still applicable?
The BSA is the principal evidence statute from 1 July 2024. The former Act continues to govern proceedings saved by the BSA's repeal-and-savings provision, section 170.
Can WhatsApp chats and emails be used as evidence?
They may be admissible if relevant and properly proved under the rules for electronic records, including applicable requirements of BSA section 63. Their authenticity and weight can still be challenged.
Must every fact be proved through a witness?
No. Documentary evidence, admissions, presumptions and judicial notice may establish or dispense with proof of facts in the circumstances specified by law.
Official legislation and legal resources
- India Code - official central legislation database (search for Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, Act 47 of 2023)
- Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice
- e-Gazette of India - official enactments and commencement notifications
- Ministry of Home Affairs - new criminal laws resources
Indian Evidence Act, 1872: Complete historical section-wise guide
The following original article links have been retained for historical research and for matters to which the repealed Act continues to apply. Their section numbers refer to the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, not to the BSA.
Preliminary and relevance of facts Sections 1-16
- Section 1 Short Title
- Section 3 Interpretation-clause
- Section 4 May Presume. Shall presume. Conclusive proof
- Section 5 Evidence may be given of facts in issue and relevant facts
- Section 6 Relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction
- Section 7 Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue
- Section 8 Motive, preparation and previous or subsequent conduct
- Section 9 Facts necessary to explain or introduce relevant facts
- Section 10 Things said or done by conspirator in reference to common design
- Section 11 When facts not otherwise relevant become relevant
- Section 12 In suits for damages, facts tending to enable Court to determine amount are relevant
- Section 13 Facts relevant when right or custom is in question
- Section 14 Facts showing existence of state of mind, or of body, or bodily feeling
- Section 15 Facts bearing on question whether act was accidental or intentional
- Section 16 Existence of course of business when relevant
Admissions and confessions Sections 17-31
- Section 17 Admission defined
- Section 18 Admission - by party to proceeding or his agent; by suitor in representative character; by party interested in subject-matter; by person from whom interest derived
- Section 19 Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit
- Section 20 Admissions by persons expressly referred to by party to suit
- Section 21 Proof of admissions against persons making them, and by or on their behalf
- Section 22 When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant
- Section 22A When oral admission as to contents of electronic records are relevant
- Section 23 Admissions in civil cases when relevant
- Section 24 Confession caused by inducement, threat or promise, when irrelevant in criminal proceeding
- Section 25 Confession to police-officer not to be proved
- Section 26 Confession by accused while in custody of Police not to be proved against him
- Section 27 How much of information received from accused, may be proved
- Section 28 Confession made after removal of impression caused by inducement, threat or promise, relevant
- Section 29 Confession otherwise relevant not to become irrelevant because of promise of secrecy, etc
- Section 30 Consideration of proved confession affecting person making it and others jointly under trial for same offence
- Section 31 Admissions not conclusive proof, but may estop
Statements, judgments and expert opinions Sections 32-55
- Section 32 Cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc.
- Section 33 Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, the truth of facts therein stated
- Section 34 Entries in books of account when relevant
- Section 35 Relevancy of entry in public record made in performance of duty
- Section 36 Relevancy of statements in maps, charts and plans
- Section 37 Relevancy of statement as to fact of public nature contained in certain Acts or notifications
- Section 38 Relevancy of statements as to any law contained in law-books
- Section 39 What evidence to be given when statement forms part of a conversation, document, electronic record, book or series of letters or papers
- Section 40 Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial
- Section 41 Relevancy of certain judgments in probate, etc., jurisdiction
- Section 42 Relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 41
- Section 43 Judgments, etc., other than those mentioned in sections 40, 41 and 42, when relevant
- Section 44 Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be proved
- Section 45 Opinions of experts
- Section 45A Opinion of Examiner of Electronic Evidence
- Section 46 Facts bearing upon opinions of experts
- Section 47 Opinion as to handwriting, when relevant
- Section 47A Opinion as to digital signature, when relevant
- Section 48 Opinion as to existence of right or custom, when relevant
- Section 49 Opinion as to usages, tenets, etc., when relevant
- Section 50 Opinion on relationship, when relevant
- Section 51 Grounds of opinion, when relevant
- Section 52 In civil cases character to prove conduct imputed, irrelevant
- Section 53 In criminal cases previous good character relevant
- Section 53A Evidence of character or previous sexual experience not relevant in certain cases
- Section 54 Previous bad character not relevant, except in reply
- Section 55 Character as affecting damages
Facts needing no proof and oral evidence Sections 56-60
Documents and electronic evidence Sections 61-90
- Section 61 Proof of contents of documents
- Section 62 Primary evidence
- Section 63 Secondary evidence
- Section 64 Proof of documents by primary evidence
- Section 65 Cases in which secondary evidence relating to documents may be given
- Section 65A Special provisions as to evidence relating to electronic record
- Section 65B Admissibility of electronic records
- Section 66 Rules as to notice to produce
- Section 67 Proof of signature and handwriting of person alleged to have signed or written document produced
- Section 67A Proof as to electronic signature
- Section 68 Proof of execution of document required by law to be attested
- Section 69 Proof where no attesting witness found
- Section 70 Admission of execution by party to attested document
- Section 71 Proof when attesting witness denies the execution
- Section 72 Proof of document not required by law to be attested
- Section 73 Comparison of signature, writing or seal with others admitted or proved
- Section 73A Proof as to verification of digital signature
- Section 74 Public documents
- Section 75 Private documents
- Section 76 Certified copies of public documents
- Section 77 Proof of documents by production of certified copies
- Section 78 Proof of other official documents
- Section 79 Presumption as to genuineness of certified copies
- Section 80 Presumption as to documents produced as record of evidence
- Section 81 Presumption as to Gazettes, newspapers, private Acts of Parliament and other documents
- Section 81A Presumption as to Gazettes in electronic forms
- Section 82 Presumption as to document admissible in England without proof of seal or signature
- Section 83 Presumption as to maps or plans made by authority of Government
- Section 84 Presumption as to collections of laws and reports of decisions
- Section 85 Presumptions as to powers-of-attorney
- Section 85A Presumption as to electronic agreements
- Section 85B Presumption as to electronic records and electronic signatures
- Section 85C Presumption as to Electronic Signature Certificates
- Section 86 Presumption as to certified copies of foreign judicial records
- Section 87 Presumption as to books, maps and charts
- Section 88 Presumption as to telegraphic messages
- Section 88A Presumption as to electronic messages
- Section 89 Presumption as to due execution, etc., of documents not produced
- Section 90 Presumption as to documents thirty years old
- Section 90A Presumption as to electronic records five years old
Documentary terms and oral evidence Sections 91-100
- Section 91 Evidence of terms of contracts, grants and other dispositions of property reduced to form of document
- Section 92 Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement
- Section 93 Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document
- Section 94 Exclusion of evidence against application of document to existing facts
- Section 95 Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts
- Section 96 Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons
- Section 97 Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies
- Section 98 Evidence as to meaning of illegible characters, etc
- Section 99 Who may give evidence of agreement varying terms of document
- Section 100 Saving of provisions of Indian Succession Act relating to wills
Burden of proof and presumptions Sections 101-114
- Section 101 Burden of proof
- Section 102 On whom burden of proof lies
- Section 103 Burden of proof as to particular fact
- Section 104 Burden of proving fact to be proved to make evidence admissible
- Section 105 Burden of proving that case of accused comes within exceptions
- Section 106 Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge
- Section 107 Burden of proving death of person known to have been alive within thirty years
- Section 108 Burden of proving that person is alive who has not been heard of for seven years
- Section 109 Burden of proof as to relationship in the cases of partners, landlord and tenant, principal and agent
- Section 110 Burden of proof as to ownership
- Section 111 Proof of good faith in transactions where one party is in relation of active confidence
- Section 111A Presumption as to certain offences
- Section 112 Birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy
- Section 113 Proof of cession of territory
- Section 113A Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman
- Section 113B Presumption as to dowry death
- Section 114 Court may presume existence of certain facts
- Section 114A Presumption as to absence of consent in certain prosecution for rape
Estoppel and witnesses Sections 115-134
- Section 115 Estoppel
- Section 116 Estoppel of tenants and of licensee of person in possession
- Section 117 Estoppel of acceptor of bill of exchange, bailee or licensee
- Section 118 Who may testify
- Section 119 Witness unable to communicate verbally
- Section 120 Parties to civil suit, and their wives or husbands. Husband or wife of person under criminal trial
- Section 121 Judges and Magistrates
- Section 122 Communications during marriage
- Section 123 Evidence as to affairs of State
- Section 124 Official communications
- Section 125 Information as to commission of offences
- Section 126 Professional communications
- Section 127 Section 126 to apply to interpreters, etc
- Section 128 Privilege not waived by volunteering evidence
- Section 129 Confidential communications with legal advisers
- Section 130 Production of title-deeds of witness not a party
- Section 131 Production of documents or electronic records which another person, having possession, could refuse to produce
- Section 132 Witness not excused from answering on ground that answer will criminate
- Section 133 Accomplice
- Section 134 Number of witnesses
Examination of witnesses Sections 135-166
- Section 135 Order of production and examination of witnesses
- Section 136 Judge to decide as to admissibility of evidence
- Section 137 Examination-in-chief
- Section 138 Order of examinations
- Section 139 Cross-examination of person called to produce a document
- Section 140 Witnesses to character
- Section 141 Leading questions
- Section 142 When they must not be asked
- Section 143 When they may be asked
- Section 144 Evidence as to matters in writing
- Section 145 Cross-examination as to previous statements in writing
- Section 146 Questions lawful in cross-examination
- Section 147 When witness to be compelled to answer
- Section 148 Court to decide when question shall be asked and when witness compelled to answer
- Section 149 Question not to be asked without reasonable grounds
- Section 150 Procedure of Court in case of question being asked without reasonable grounds
- Section 151 Indecent and scandalous questions
- Section 152 Questions intended to insult or annoy
- Section 153 Exclusion of evidence to contradict answers to questions testing veracity
- Section 154 Question by party to his own witness
- Section 155 Impeaching credit of witness
- Section 156 Questions tending to corroborate evidence of relevant fact, admissible
- Section 157 Former statements of witness may be proved to corroborate later testimony as to same fact
- Section 158 What matters may be proved in connection with proved statement relevant under section 32 or 33
- Section 159 Refreshing memory
- Section 160 Testimony to facts stated in document mentioned in section159
- Section 161 Right of adverse party as to writing used to refresh memory
- Section 162 Production of documents
- Section 163 Giving, as evidence, of document called for and produced on notice
- Section 164 Using, as evidence, of document production of which was refused on notice
- Section 165 Judges power to put questions or order production
- Section 166 Power of jury or assessors to put questions
